Documentation / git-tag.txton commit Merge tag 'v2.9.5' into maint-2.10 (d78f06a)
   1git-tag(1)
   2==========
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-tag - Create, list, delete or verify a tag object signed with GPG
   7
   8
   9SYNOPSIS
  10--------
  11[verse]
  12'git tag' [-a | -s | -u <keyid>] [-f] [-m <msg> | -F <file>]
  13        <tagname> [<commit> | <object>]
  14'git tag' -d <tagname>...
  15'git tag' [-n[<num>]] -l [--contains <commit>] [--points-at <object>]
  16        [--column[=<options>] | --no-column] [--create-reflog] [--sort=<key>]
  17        [--format=<format>] [--[no-]merged [<commit>]] [<pattern>...]
  18'git tag' -v <tagname>...
  19
  20DESCRIPTION
  21-----------
  22
  23Add a tag reference in `refs/tags/`, unless `-d/-l/-v` is given
  24to delete, list or verify tags.
  25
  26Unless `-f` is given, the named tag must not yet exist.
  27
  28If one of `-a`, `-s`, or `-u <keyid>` is passed, the command
  29creates a 'tag' object, and requires a tag message.  Unless
  30`-m <msg>` or `-F <file>` is given, an editor is started for the user to type
  31in the tag message.
  32
  33If `-m <msg>` or `-F <file>` is given and `-a`, `-s`, and `-u <keyid>`
  34are absent, `-a` is implied.
  35
  36Otherwise just a tag reference for the SHA-1 object name of the commit object is
  37created (i.e. a lightweight tag).
  38
  39A GnuPG signed tag object will be created when `-s` or `-u
  40<keyid>` is used.  When `-u <keyid>` is not used, the
  41committer identity for the current user is used to find the
  42GnuPG key for signing.  The configuration variable `gpg.program`
  43is used to specify custom GnuPG binary.
  44
  45Tag objects (created with `-a`, `-s`, or `-u`) are called "annotated"
  46tags; they contain a creation date, the tagger name and e-mail, a
  47tagging message, and an optional GnuPG signature. Whereas a
  48"lightweight" tag is simply a name for an object (usually a commit
  49object).
  50
  51Annotated tags are meant for release while lightweight tags are meant
  52for private or temporary object labels. For this reason, some git
  53commands for naming objects (like `git describe`) will ignore
  54lightweight tags by default.
  55
  56
  57OPTIONS
  58-------
  59-a::
  60--annotate::
  61        Make an unsigned, annotated tag object
  62
  63-s::
  64--sign::
  65        Make a GPG-signed tag, using the default e-mail address's key.
  66
  67-u <keyid>::
  68--local-user=<keyid>::
  69        Make a GPG-signed tag, using the given key.
  70
  71-f::
  72--force::
  73        Replace an existing tag with the given name (instead of failing)
  74
  75-d::
  76--delete::
  77        Delete existing tags with the given names.
  78
  79-v::
  80--verify::
  81        Verify the GPG signature of the given tag names.
  82
  83-n<num>::
  84        <num> specifies how many lines from the annotation, if any,
  85        are printed when using -l.
  86        The default is not to print any annotation lines.
  87        If no number is given to `-n`, only the first line is printed.
  88        If the tag is not annotated, the commit message is displayed instead.
  89
  90-l <pattern>::
  91--list <pattern>::
  92        List tags with names that match the given pattern (or all if no
  93        pattern is given).  Running "git tag" without arguments also
  94        lists all tags. The pattern is a shell wildcard (i.e., matched
  95        using fnmatch(3)).  Multiple patterns may be given; if any of
  96        them matches, the tag is shown.
  97
  98--sort=<key>::
  99        Sort based on the key given.  Prefix `-` to sort in
 100        descending order of the value. You may use the --sort=<key> option
 101        multiple times, in which case the last key becomes the primary
 102        key. Also supports "version:refname" or "v:refname" (tag
 103        names are treated as versions). The "version:refname" sort
 104        order can also be affected by the
 105        "versionsort.prereleaseSuffix" configuration variable.
 106        The keys supported are the same as those in `git for-each-ref`.
 107        Sort order defaults to the value configured for the `tag.sort`
 108        variable if it exists, or lexicographic order otherwise. See
 109        linkgit:git-config[1].
 110
 111--column[=<options>]::
 112--no-column::
 113        Display tag listing in columns. See configuration variable
 114        column.tag for option syntax.`--column` and `--no-column`
 115        without options are equivalent to 'always' and 'never' respectively.
 116+
 117This option is only applicable when listing tags without annotation lines.
 118
 119--contains [<commit>]::
 120        Only list tags which contain the specified commit (HEAD if not
 121        specified).
 122
 123--points-at <object>::
 124        Only list tags of the given object.
 125
 126-m <msg>::
 127--message=<msg>::
 128        Use the given tag message (instead of prompting).
 129        If multiple `-m` options are given, their values are
 130        concatenated as separate paragraphs.
 131        Implies `-a` if none of `-a`, `-s`, or `-u <keyid>`
 132        is given.
 133
 134-F <file>::
 135--file=<file>::
 136        Take the tag message from the given file.  Use '-' to
 137        read the message from the standard input.
 138        Implies `-a` if none of `-a`, `-s`, or `-u <keyid>`
 139        is given.
 140
 141--cleanup=<mode>::
 142        This option sets how the tag message is cleaned up.
 143        The  '<mode>' can be one of 'verbatim', 'whitespace' and 'strip'.  The
 144        'strip' mode is default. The 'verbatim' mode does not change message at
 145        all, 'whitespace' removes just leading/trailing whitespace lines and
 146        'strip' removes both whitespace and commentary.
 147
 148--create-reflog::
 149        Create a reflog for the tag.
 150
 151<tagname>::
 152        The name of the tag to create, delete, or describe.
 153        The new tag name must pass all checks defined by
 154        linkgit:git-check-ref-format[1].  Some of these checks
 155        may restrict the characters allowed in a tag name.
 156
 157<commit>::
 158<object>::
 159        The object that the new tag will refer to, usually a commit.
 160        Defaults to HEAD.
 161
 162<format>::
 163        A string that interpolates `%(fieldname)` from the object
 164        pointed at by a ref being shown.  The format is the same as
 165        that of linkgit:git-for-each-ref[1].  When unspecified,
 166        defaults to `%(refname:strip=2)`.
 167
 168--[no-]merged [<commit>]::
 169        Only list tags whose tips are reachable, or not reachable
 170        if `--no-merged` is used, from the specified commit (`HEAD`
 171        if not specified).
 172
 173CONFIGURATION
 174-------------
 175By default, 'git tag' in sign-with-default mode (-s) will use your
 176committer identity (of the form `Your Name <your@email.address>`) to
 177find a key.  If you want to use a different default key, you can specify
 178it in the repository configuration as follows:
 179
 180-------------------------------------
 181[user]
 182    signingKey = <gpg-keyid>
 183-------------------------------------
 184
 185
 186DISCUSSION
 187----------
 188
 189On Re-tagging
 190~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 191
 192What should you do when you tag a wrong commit and you would
 193want to re-tag?
 194
 195If you never pushed anything out, just re-tag it. Use "-f" to
 196replace the old one. And you're done.
 197
 198But if you have pushed things out (or others could just read
 199your repository directly), then others will have already seen
 200the old tag. In that case you can do one of two things:
 201
 202. The sane thing.
 203Just admit you screwed up, and use a different name. Others have
 204already seen one tag-name, and if you keep the same name, you
 205may be in the situation that two people both have "version X",
 206but they actually have 'different' "X"'s.  So just call it "X.1"
 207and be done with it.
 208
 209. The insane thing.
 210You really want to call the new version "X" too, 'even though'
 211others have already seen the old one. So just use 'git tag -f'
 212again, as if you hadn't already published the old one.
 213
 214However, Git does *not* (and it should not) change tags behind
 215users back. So if somebody already got the old tag, doing a
 216'git pull' on your tree shouldn't just make them overwrite the old
 217one.
 218
 219If somebody got a release tag from you, you cannot just change
 220the tag for them by updating your own one. This is a big
 221security issue, in that people MUST be able to trust their
 222tag-names.  If you really want to do the insane thing, you need
 223to just fess up to it, and tell people that you messed up. You
 224can do that by making a very public announcement saying:
 225
 226------------
 227Ok, I messed up, and I pushed out an earlier version tagged as X. I
 228then fixed something, and retagged the *fixed* tree as X again.
 229
 230If you got the wrong tag, and want the new one, please delete
 231the old one and fetch the new one by doing:
 232
 233        git tag -d X
 234        git fetch origin tag X
 235
 236to get my updated tag.
 237
 238You can test which tag you have by doing
 239
 240        git rev-parse X
 241
 242which should return 0123456789abcdef.. if you have the new version.
 243
 244Sorry for the inconvenience.
 245------------
 246
 247Does this seem a bit complicated?  It *should* be. There is no
 248way that it would be correct to just "fix" it automatically.
 249People need to know that their tags might have been changed.
 250
 251
 252On Automatic following
 253~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 254
 255If you are following somebody else's tree, you are most likely
 256using remote-tracking branches (eg. `refs/remotes/origin/master`).
 257You usually want the tags from the other end.
 258
 259On the other hand, if you are fetching because you would want a
 260one-shot merge from somebody else, you typically do not want to
 261get tags from there.  This happens more often for people near
 262the toplevel but not limited to them.  Mere mortals when pulling
 263from each other do not necessarily want to automatically get
 264private anchor point tags from the other person.
 265
 266Often, "please pull" messages on the mailing list just provide
 267two pieces of information: a repo URL and a branch name; this
 268is designed to be easily cut&pasted at the end of a 'git fetch'
 269command line:
 270
 271------------
 272Linus, please pull from
 273
 274        git://git..../proj.git master
 275
 276to get the following updates...
 277------------
 278
 279becomes:
 280
 281------------
 282$ git pull git://git..../proj.git master
 283------------
 284
 285In such a case, you do not want to automatically follow the other
 286person's tags.
 287
 288One important aspect of Git is its distributed nature, which
 289largely means there is no inherent "upstream" or
 290"downstream" in the system.  On the face of it, the above
 291example might seem to indicate that the tag namespace is owned
 292by the upper echelon of people and that tags only flow downwards, but
 293that is not the case.  It only shows that the usage pattern
 294determines who are interested in whose tags.
 295
 296A one-shot pull is a sign that a commit history is now crossing
 297the boundary between one circle of people (e.g. "people who are
 298primarily interested in the networking part of the kernel") who may
 299have their own set of tags (e.g. "this is the third release
 300candidate from the networking group to be proposed for general
 301consumption with 2.6.21 release") to another circle of people
 302(e.g. "people who integrate various subsystem improvements").
 303The latter are usually not interested in the detailed tags used
 304internally in the former group (that is what "internal" means).
 305That is why it is desirable not to follow tags automatically in
 306this case.
 307
 308It may well be that among networking people, they may want to
 309exchange the tags internal to their group, but in that workflow
 310they are most likely tracking each other's progress by
 311having remote-tracking branches.  Again, the heuristic to automatically
 312follow such tags is a good thing.
 313
 314
 315On Backdating Tags
 316~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 317
 318If you have imported some changes from another VCS and would like
 319to add tags for major releases of your work, it is useful to be able
 320to specify the date to embed inside of the tag object; such data in
 321the tag object affects, for example, the ordering of tags in the
 322gitweb interface.
 323
 324To set the date used in future tag objects, set the environment
 325variable GIT_COMMITTER_DATE (see the later discussion of possible
 326values; the most common form is "YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM").
 327
 328For example:
 329
 330------------
 331$ GIT_COMMITTER_DATE="2006-10-02 10:31" git tag -s v1.0.1
 332------------
 333
 334include::date-formats.txt[]
 335
 336SEE ALSO
 337--------
 338linkgit:git-check-ref-format[1].
 339linkgit:git-config[1].
 340
 341GIT
 342---
 343Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite