Documentation / git-merge.txton commit Merge branch 'rs/pp-user-info-without-extra-allocation' (d9291ec)
   1git-merge(1)
   2============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-merge - Join two or more development histories together
   7
   8
   9SYNOPSIS
  10--------
  11[verse]
  12'git merge' [-n] [--stat] [--no-commit] [--squash] [--[no-]edit]
  13        [-s <strategy>] [-X <strategy-option>]
  14        [--[no-]rerere-autoupdate] [-m <msg>] [<commit>...]
  15'git merge' <msg> HEAD <commit>...
  16'git merge' --abort
  17
  18DESCRIPTION
  19-----------
  20Incorporates changes from the named commits (since the time their
  21histories diverged from the current branch) into the current
  22branch.  This command is used by 'git pull' to incorporate changes
  23from another repository and can be used by hand to merge changes
  24from one branch into another.
  25
  26Assume the following history exists and the current branch is
  27"`master`":
  28
  29------------
  30          A---B---C topic
  31         /
  32    D---E---F---G master
  33------------
  34
  35Then "`git merge topic`" will replay the changes made on the
  36`topic` branch since it diverged from `master` (i.e., `E`) until
  37its current commit (`C`) on top of `master`, and record the result
  38in a new commit along with the names of the two parent commits and
  39a log message from the user describing the changes.
  40
  41------------
  42          A---B---C topic
  43         /         \
  44    D---E---F---G---H master
  45------------
  46
  47The second syntax (<msg> `HEAD` <commit>...) is supported for
  48historical reasons.  Do not use it from the command line or in
  49new scripts.  It is the same as `git merge -m <msg> <commit>...`.
  50
  51The third syntax ("`git merge --abort`") can only be run after the
  52merge has resulted in conflicts. 'git merge --abort' will abort the
  53merge process and try to reconstruct the pre-merge state. However,
  54if there were uncommitted changes when the merge started (and
  55especially if those changes were further modified after the merge
  56was started), 'git merge --abort' will in some cases be unable to
  57reconstruct the original (pre-merge) changes. Therefore:
  58
  59*Warning*: Running 'git merge' with uncommitted changes is
  60discouraged: while possible, it leaves you in a state that is hard to
  61back out of in the case of a conflict.
  62
  63
  64OPTIONS
  65-------
  66include::merge-options.txt[]
  67
  68-m <msg>::
  69        Set the commit message to be used for the merge commit (in
  70        case one is created).
  71+
  72If `--log` is specified, a shortlog of the commits being merged
  73will be appended to the specified message.
  74+
  75The 'git fmt-merge-msg' command can be
  76used to give a good default for automated 'git merge'
  77invocations.
  78
  79--rerere-autoupdate::
  80--no-rerere-autoupdate::
  81        Allow the rerere mechanism to update the index with the
  82        result of auto-conflict resolution if possible.
  83
  84--abort::
  85        Abort the current conflict resolution process, and
  86        try to reconstruct the pre-merge state.
  87+
  88If there were uncommitted worktree changes present when the merge
  89started, 'git merge --abort' will in some cases be unable to
  90reconstruct these changes. It is therefore recommended to always
  91commit or stash your changes before running 'git merge'.
  92+
  93'git merge --abort' is equivalent to 'git reset --merge' when
  94`MERGE_HEAD` is present.
  95
  96<commit>...::
  97        Commits, usually other branch heads, to merge into our branch.
  98        Specifying more than one commit will create a merge with
  99        more than two parents (affectionately called an Octopus merge).
 100+
 101If no commit is given from the command line, and if `merge.defaultToUpstream`
 102configuration variable is set, merge the remote-tracking branches
 103that the current branch is configured to use as its upstream.
 104See also the configuration section of this manual page.
 105
 106
 107PRE-MERGE CHECKS
 108----------------
 109
 110Before applying outside changes, you should get your own work in
 111good shape and committed locally, so it will not be clobbered if
 112there are conflicts.  See also linkgit:git-stash[1].
 113'git pull' and 'git merge' will stop without doing anything when
 114local uncommitted changes overlap with files that 'git pull'/'git
 115merge' may need to update.
 116
 117To avoid recording unrelated changes in the merge commit,
 118'git pull' and 'git merge' will also abort if there are any changes
 119registered in the index relative to the `HEAD` commit.  (One
 120exception is when the changed index entries are in the state that
 121would result from the merge already.)
 122
 123If all named commits are already ancestors of `HEAD`, 'git merge'
 124will exit early with the message "Already up-to-date."
 125
 126FAST-FORWARD MERGE
 127------------------
 128
 129Often the current branch head is an ancestor of the named commit.
 130This is the most common case especially when invoked from 'git
 131pull': you are tracking an upstream repository, you have committed
 132no local changes, and now you want to update to a newer upstream
 133revision.  In this case, a new commit is not needed to store the
 134combined history; instead, the `HEAD` (along with the index) is
 135updated to point at the named commit, without creating an extra
 136merge commit.
 137
 138This behavior can be suppressed with the `--no-ff` option.
 139
 140TRUE MERGE
 141----------
 142
 143Except in a fast-forward merge (see above), the branches to be
 144merged must be tied together by a merge commit that has both of them
 145as its parents.
 146
 147A merged version reconciling the changes from all branches to be
 148merged is committed, and your `HEAD`, index, and working tree are
 149updated to it.  It is possible to have modifications in the working
 150tree as long as they do not overlap; the update will preserve them.
 151
 152When it is not obvious how to reconcile the changes, the following
 153happens:
 154
 1551. The `HEAD` pointer stays the same.
 1562. The `MERGE_HEAD` ref is set to point to the other branch head.
 1573. Paths that merged cleanly are updated both in the index file and
 158   in your working tree.
 1594. For conflicting paths, the index file records up to three
 160   versions: stage 1 stores the version from the common ancestor,
 161   stage 2 from `HEAD`, and stage 3 from `MERGE_HEAD` (you
 162   can inspect the stages with `git ls-files -u`).  The working
 163   tree files contain the result of the "merge" program; i.e. 3-way
 164   merge results with familiar conflict markers `<<<` `===` `>>>`.
 1655. No other changes are made.  In particular, the local
 166   modifications you had before you started merge will stay the
 167   same and the index entries for them stay as they were,
 168   i.e. matching `HEAD`.
 169
 170If you tried a merge which resulted in complex conflicts and
 171want to start over, you can recover with `git merge --abort`.
 172
 173MERGING TAG
 174-----------
 175
 176When merging an annotated (and possibly signed) tag, Git always
 177creates a merge commit even if a fast-forward merge is possible, and
 178the commit message template is prepared with the tag message.
 179Additionally, if the tag is signed, the signature check is reported
 180as a comment in the message template. See also linkgit:git-tag[1].
 181
 182When you want to just integrate with the work leading to the commit
 183that happens to be tagged, e.g. synchronizing with an upstream
 184release point, you may not want to make an unnecessary merge commit.
 185
 186In such a case, you can "unwrap" the tag yourself before feeding it
 187to `git merge`, or pass `--ff-only` when you do not have any work on
 188your own. e.g.
 189
 190---
 191git fetch origin
 192git merge v1.2.3^0
 193git merge --ff-only v1.2.3
 194---
 195
 196
 197HOW CONFLICTS ARE PRESENTED
 198---------------------------
 199
 200During a merge, the working tree files are updated to reflect the result
 201of the merge.  Among the changes made to the common ancestor's version,
 202non-overlapping ones (that is, you changed an area of the file while the
 203other side left that area intact, or vice versa) are incorporated in the
 204final result verbatim.  When both sides made changes to the same area,
 205however, Git cannot randomly pick one side over the other, and asks you to
 206resolve it by leaving what both sides did to that area.
 207
 208By default, Git uses the same style as the one used by the "merge" program
 209from the RCS suite to present such a conflicted hunk, like this:
 210
 211------------
 212Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
 213ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
 214<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
 215Conflict resolution is hard;
 216let's go shopping.
 217=======
 218Git makes conflict resolution easy.
 219>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
 220And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
 221------------
 222
 223The area where a pair of conflicting changes happened is marked with markers
 224`<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>`.  The part before the `=======`
 225is typically your side, and the part afterwards is typically their side.
 226
 227The default format does not show what the original said in the conflicting
 228area.  You cannot tell how many lines are deleted and replaced with
 229Barbie's remark on your side.  The only thing you can tell is that your
 230side wants to say it is hard and you'd prefer to go shopping, while the
 231other side wants to claim it is easy.
 232
 233An alternative style can be used by setting the "merge.conflictstyle"
 234configuration variable to "diff3".  In "diff3" style, the above conflict
 235may look like this:
 236
 237------------
 238Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
 239ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
 240<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
 241Conflict resolution is hard;
 242let's go shopping.
 243|||||||
 244Conflict resolution is hard.
 245=======
 246Git makes conflict resolution easy.
 247>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
 248And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
 249------------
 250
 251In addition to the `<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>` markers, it uses
 252another `|||||||` marker that is followed by the original text.  You can
 253tell that the original just stated a fact, and your side simply gave in to
 254that statement and gave up, while the other side tried to have a more
 255positive attitude.  You can sometimes come up with a better resolution by
 256viewing the original.
 257
 258
 259HOW TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS
 260------------------------
 261
 262After seeing a conflict, you can do two things:
 263
 264 * Decide not to merge.  The only clean-ups you need are to reset
 265   the index file to the `HEAD` commit to reverse 2. and to clean
 266   up working tree changes made by 2. and 3.; `git merge --abort`
 267   can be used for this.
 268
 269 * Resolve the conflicts.  Git will mark the conflicts in
 270   the working tree.  Edit the files into shape and
 271   'git add' them to the index.  Use 'git commit' to seal the deal.
 272
 273You can work through the conflict with a number of tools:
 274
 275 * Use a mergetool.  `git mergetool` to launch a graphical
 276   mergetool which will work you through the merge.
 277
 278 * Look at the diffs.  `git diff` will show a three-way diff,
 279   highlighting changes from both the `HEAD` and `MERGE_HEAD`
 280   versions.
 281
 282 * Look at the diffs from each branch. `git log --merge -p <path>`
 283   will show diffs first for the `HEAD` version and then the
 284   `MERGE_HEAD` version.
 285
 286 * Look at the originals.  `git show :1:filename` shows the
 287   common ancestor, `git show :2:filename` shows the `HEAD`
 288   version, and `git show :3:filename` shows the `MERGE_HEAD`
 289   version.
 290
 291
 292EXAMPLES
 293--------
 294
 295* Merge branches `fixes` and `enhancements` on top of
 296  the current branch, making an octopus merge:
 297+
 298------------------------------------------------
 299$ git merge fixes enhancements
 300------------------------------------------------
 301
 302* Merge branch `obsolete` into the current branch, using `ours`
 303  merge strategy:
 304+
 305------------------------------------------------
 306$ git merge -s ours obsolete
 307------------------------------------------------
 308
 309* Merge branch `maint` into the current branch, but do not make
 310  a new commit automatically:
 311+
 312------------------------------------------------
 313$ git merge --no-commit maint
 314------------------------------------------------
 315+
 316This can be used when you want to include further changes to the
 317merge, or want to write your own merge commit message.
 318+
 319You should refrain from abusing this option to sneak substantial
 320changes into a merge commit.  Small fixups like bumping
 321release/version name would be acceptable.
 322
 323
 324include::merge-strategies.txt[]
 325
 326CONFIGURATION
 327-------------
 328include::merge-config.txt[]
 329
 330branch.<name>.mergeoptions::
 331        Sets default options for merging into branch <name>. The syntax and
 332        supported options are the same as those of 'git merge', but option
 333        values containing whitespace characters are currently not supported.
 334
 335SEE ALSO
 336--------
 337linkgit:git-fmt-merge-msg[1], linkgit:git-pull[1],
 338linkgit:gitattributes[5],
 339linkgit:git-reset[1],
 340linkgit:git-diff[1], linkgit:git-ls-files[1],
 341linkgit:git-add[1], linkgit:git-rm[1],
 342linkgit:git-mergetool[1]
 343
 344GIT
 345---
 346Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite