Documentation / git-tag.txton commit merge/pull Check for untrusted good GPG signatures (eb307ae)
   1git-tag(1)
   2==========
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-tag - Create, list, delete or verify a tag object signed with GPG
   7
   8
   9SYNOPSIS
  10--------
  11[verse]
  12'git tag' [-a | -s | -u <key-id>] [-f] [-m <msg> | -F <file>]
  13        <tagname> [<commit> | <object>]
  14'git tag' -d <tagname>...
  15'git tag' [-n[<num>]] -l [--contains <commit>] [--points-at <object>]
  16        [--column[=<options>] | --no-column] [<pattern>...]
  17        [<pattern>...]
  18'git tag' -v <tagname>...
  19
  20DESCRIPTION
  21-----------
  22
  23Add a tag reference in `refs/tags/`, unless `-d/-l/-v` is given
  24to delete, list or verify tags.
  25
  26Unless `-f` is given, the named tag must not yet exist.
  27
  28If one of `-a`, `-s`, or `-u <key-id>` is passed, the command
  29creates a 'tag' object, and requires a tag message.  Unless
  30`-m <msg>` or `-F <file>` is given, an editor is started for the user to type
  31in the tag message.
  32
  33If `-m <msg>` or `-F <file>` is given and `-a`, `-s`, and `-u <key-id>`
  34are absent, `-a` is implied.
  35
  36Otherwise just a tag reference for the SHA1 object name of the commit object is
  37created (i.e. a lightweight tag).
  38
  39A GnuPG signed tag object will be created when `-s` or `-u
  40<key-id>` is used.  When `-u <key-id>` is not used, the
  41committer identity for the current user is used to find the
  42GnuPG key for signing.  The configuration variable `gpg.program`
  43is used to specify custom GnuPG binary.
  44
  45
  46OPTIONS
  47-------
  48-a::
  49--annotate::
  50        Make an unsigned, annotated tag object
  51
  52-s::
  53--sign::
  54        Make a GPG-signed tag, using the default e-mail address's key.
  55
  56-u <key-id>::
  57--local-user=<key-id>::
  58        Make a GPG-signed tag, using the given key.
  59
  60-f::
  61--force::
  62        Replace an existing tag with the given name (instead of failing)
  63
  64-d::
  65--delete::
  66        Delete existing tags with the given names.
  67
  68-v::
  69--verify::
  70        Verify the gpg signature of the given tag names.
  71
  72-n<num>::
  73        <num> specifies how many lines from the annotation, if any,
  74        are printed when using -l.
  75        The default is not to print any annotation lines.
  76        If no number is given to `-n`, only the first line is printed.
  77        If the tag is not annotated, the commit message is displayed instead.
  78
  79-l <pattern>::
  80--list <pattern>::
  81        List tags with names that match the given pattern (or all if no
  82        pattern is given).  Running "git tag" without arguments also
  83        lists all tags. The pattern is a shell wildcard (i.e., matched
  84        using fnmatch(3)).  Multiple patterns may be given; if any of
  85        them matches, the tag is shown.
  86
  87--column[=<options>]::
  88--no-column::
  89        Display tag listing in columns. See configuration variable
  90        column.tag for option syntax.`--column` and `--no-column`
  91        without options are equivalent to 'always' and 'never' respectively.
  92+
  93This option is only applicable when listing tags without annotation lines.
  94
  95--contains <commit>::
  96        Only list tags which contain the specified commit.
  97
  98--points-at <object>::
  99        Only list tags of the given object.
 100
 101-m <msg>::
 102--message=<msg>::
 103        Use the given tag message (instead of prompting).
 104        If multiple `-m` options are given, their values are
 105        concatenated as separate paragraphs.
 106        Implies `-a` if none of `-a`, `-s`, or `-u <key-id>`
 107        is given.
 108
 109-F <file>::
 110--file=<file>::
 111        Take the tag message from the given file.  Use '-' to
 112        read the message from the standard input.
 113        Implies `-a` if none of `-a`, `-s`, or `-u <key-id>`
 114        is given.
 115
 116--cleanup=<mode>::
 117        This option sets how the tag message is cleaned up.
 118        The  '<mode>' can be one of 'verbatim', 'whitespace' and 'strip'.  The
 119        'strip' mode is default. The 'verbatim' mode does not change message at
 120        all, 'whitespace' removes just leading/trailing whitespace lines and
 121        'strip' removes both whitespace and commentary.
 122
 123<tagname>::
 124        The name of the tag to create, delete, or describe.
 125        The new tag name must pass all checks defined by
 126        linkgit:git-check-ref-format[1].  Some of these checks
 127        may restrict the characters allowed in a tag name.
 128
 129CONFIGURATION
 130-------------
 131By default, 'git tag' in sign-with-default mode (-s) will use your
 132committer identity (of the form "Your Name <\your@email.address>") to
 133find a key.  If you want to use a different default key, you can specify
 134it in the repository configuration as follows:
 135
 136-------------------------------------
 137[user]
 138    signingkey = <gpg-key-id>
 139-------------------------------------
 140
 141
 142DISCUSSION
 143----------
 144
 145On Re-tagging
 146~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 147
 148What should you do when you tag a wrong commit and you would
 149want to re-tag?
 150
 151If you never pushed anything out, just re-tag it. Use "-f" to
 152replace the old one. And you're done.
 153
 154But if you have pushed things out (or others could just read
 155your repository directly), then others will have already seen
 156the old tag. In that case you can do one of two things:
 157
 158. The sane thing.
 159Just admit you screwed up, and use a different name. Others have
 160already seen one tag-name, and if you keep the same name, you
 161may be in the situation that two people both have "version X",
 162but they actually have 'different' "X"'s.  So just call it "X.1"
 163and be done with it.
 164
 165. The insane thing.
 166You really want to call the new version "X" too, 'even though'
 167others have already seen the old one. So just use 'git tag -f'
 168again, as if you hadn't already published the old one.
 169
 170However, Git does *not* (and it should not) change tags behind
 171users back. So if somebody already got the old tag, doing a
 172'git pull' on your tree shouldn't just make them overwrite the old
 173one.
 174
 175If somebody got a release tag from you, you cannot just change
 176the tag for them by updating your own one. This is a big
 177security issue, in that people MUST be able to trust their
 178tag-names.  If you really want to do the insane thing, you need
 179to just fess up to it, and tell people that you messed up. You
 180can do that by making a very public announcement saying:
 181
 182------------
 183Ok, I messed up, and I pushed out an earlier version tagged as X. I
 184then fixed something, and retagged the *fixed* tree as X again.
 185
 186If you got the wrong tag, and want the new one, please delete
 187the old one and fetch the new one by doing:
 188
 189        git tag -d X
 190        git fetch origin tag X
 191
 192to get my updated tag.
 193
 194You can test which tag you have by doing
 195
 196        git rev-parse X
 197
 198which should return 0123456789abcdef.. if you have the new version.
 199
 200Sorry for the inconvenience.
 201------------
 202
 203Does this seem a bit complicated?  It *should* be. There is no
 204way that it would be correct to just "fix" it automatically.
 205People need to know that their tags might have been changed.
 206
 207
 208On Automatic following
 209~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 210
 211If you are following somebody else's tree, you are most likely
 212using remote-tracking branches (`refs/heads/origin` in traditional
 213layout, or `refs/remotes/origin/master` in the separate-remote
 214layout).  You usually want the tags from the other end.
 215
 216On the other hand, if you are fetching because you would want a
 217one-shot merge from somebody else, you typically do not want to
 218get tags from there.  This happens more often for people near
 219the toplevel but not limited to them.  Mere mortals when pulling
 220from each other do not necessarily want to automatically get
 221private anchor point tags from the other person.
 222
 223Often, "please pull" messages on the mailing list just provide
 224two pieces of information: a repo URL and a branch name; this
 225is designed to be easily cut&pasted at the end of a 'git fetch'
 226command line:
 227
 228------------
 229Linus, please pull from
 230
 231        git://git..../proj.git master
 232
 233to get the following updates...
 234------------
 235
 236becomes:
 237
 238------------
 239$ git pull git://git..../proj.git master
 240------------
 241
 242In such a case, you do not want to automatically follow the other
 243person's tags.
 244
 245One important aspect of Git is its distributed nature, which
 246largely means there is no inherent "upstream" or
 247"downstream" in the system.  On the face of it, the above
 248example might seem to indicate that the tag namespace is owned
 249by the upper echelon of people and that tags only flow downwards, but
 250that is not the case.  It only shows that the usage pattern
 251determines who are interested in whose tags.
 252
 253A one-shot pull is a sign that a commit history is now crossing
 254the boundary between one circle of people (e.g. "people who are
 255primarily interested in the networking part of the kernel") who may
 256have their own set of tags (e.g. "this is the third release
 257candidate from the networking group to be proposed for general
 258consumption with 2.6.21 release") to another circle of people
 259(e.g. "people who integrate various subsystem improvements").
 260The latter are usually not interested in the detailed tags used
 261internally in the former group (that is what "internal" means).
 262That is why it is desirable not to follow tags automatically in
 263this case.
 264
 265It may well be that among networking people, they may want to
 266exchange the tags internal to their group, but in that workflow
 267they are most likely tracking each other's progress by
 268having remote-tracking branches.  Again, the heuristic to automatically
 269follow such tags is a good thing.
 270
 271
 272On Backdating Tags
 273~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 274
 275If you have imported some changes from another VCS and would like
 276to add tags for major releases of your work, it is useful to be able
 277to specify the date to embed inside of the tag object; such data in
 278the tag object affects, for example, the ordering of tags in the
 279gitweb interface.
 280
 281To set the date used in future tag objects, set the environment
 282variable GIT_COMMITTER_DATE (see the later discussion of possible
 283values; the most common form is "YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM").
 284
 285For example:
 286
 287------------
 288$ GIT_COMMITTER_DATE="2006-10-02 10:31" git tag -s v1.0.1
 289------------
 290
 291include::date-formats.txt[]
 292
 293SEE ALSO
 294--------
 295linkgit:git-check-ref-format[1].
 296
 297GIT
 298---
 299Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite