Documentation / tutorial.txton commit Update packedGit config option documentation. (eb92242)
   1A tutorial introduction to git
   2==============================
   3
   4This tutorial explains how to import a new project into git, make
   5changes to it, and share changes with other developers.
   6
   7First, note that you can get documentation for a command such as "git
   8diff" with:
   9
  10------------------------------------------------
  11$ man git-diff
  12------------------------------------------------
  13
  14It is a good idea to introduce yourself to git before doing any
  15operation.  The easiest way to do so is:
  16
  17------------------------------------------------
  18$ cat >~/.gitconfig <<\EOF
  19[user]
  20        name = Your Name Comes Here
  21        email = you@yourdomain.example.com
  22EOF
  23------------------------------------------------
  24
  25
  26Importing a new project
  27-----------------------
  28
  29Assume you have a tarball project.tar.gz with your initial work.  You
  30can place it under git revision control as follows.
  31
  32------------------------------------------------
  33$ tar xzf project.tar.gz
  34$ cd project
  35$ git init-db
  36------------------------------------------------
  37
  38Git will reply
  39
  40------------------------------------------------
  41Initialized empty Git repository in .git/
  42------------------------------------------------
  43
  44You've now initialized the working directory--you may notice a new
  45directory created, named ".git".  Tell git that you want it to track
  46every file under the current directory with (notice the dot '.'
  47that means the current directory):
  48
  49------------------------------------------------
  50$ git add .
  51------------------------------------------------
  52
  53Finally,
  54
  55------------------------------------------------
  56$ git commit
  57------------------------------------------------
  58
  59will prompt you for a commit message, then record the current state
  60of all the files to the repository.
  61
  62Try modifying some files, then run
  63
  64------------------------------------------------
  65$ git diff
  66------------------------------------------------
  67
  68to review your changes.  When you're done,
  69
  70------------------------------------------------
  71$ git commit file1 file2...
  72------------------------------------------------
  73
  74will again prompt your for a message describing the change, and then
  75record the new versions of the files you listed.  It is cumbersome
  76to list all files and you can say `-a` (which stands for 'all')
  77instead.
  78
  79------------------------------------------------
  80$ git commit -a
  81------------------------------------------------
  82
  83A note on commit messages: Though not required, it's a good idea to
  84begin the commit message with a single short (less than 50 character)
  85line summarizing the change, followed by a blank line and then a more
  86thorough description.  Tools that turn commits into email, for
  87example, use the first line on the Subject line and the rest of the
  88commit in the body.
  89
  90
  91Git tracks content not files
  92----------------------------
  93
  94With git you have to explicitly "add" all the changed _content_ you
  95want to commit together. This can be done in a few different ways:
  96
  971) By using 'git add <file_spec>...'
  98
  99   This can be performed multiple times before a commit.  Note that this
 100   is not only for adding new files.  Even modified files must be
 101   added to the set of changes about to be committed.  The "git status"
 102   command gives you a summary of what is included so far for the
 103   next commit.  When done you should use the 'git commit' command to
 104   make it real.
 105
 106   Note: don't forget to 'add' a file again if you modified it after the
 107   first 'add' and before 'commit'. Otherwise only the previous added
 108   state of that file will be committed. This is because git tracks
 109   content, so what you're really 'add'ing to the commit is the *content*
 110   of the file in the state it is in when you 'add' it.
 111
 1122) By using 'git commit -a' directly
 113
 114   This is a quick way to automatically 'add' the content from all files
 115   that were modified since the previous commit, and perform the actual
 116   commit without having to separately 'add' them beforehand.  This will
 117   not add content from new files i.e. files that were never added before.
 118   Those files still have to be added explicitly before performing a
 119   commit.
 120
 121But here's a twist. If you do 'git commit <file1> <file2> ...' then only
 122the  changes belonging to those explicitly specified files will be
 123committed, entirely bypassing the current "added" changes. Those "added"
 124changes will still remain available for a subsequent commit though.
 125
 126However, for normal usage you only have to remember 'git add' + 'git commit'
 127and/or 'git commit -a'.
 128
 129
 130Viewing the changelog
 131---------------------
 132
 133At any point you can view the history of your changes using
 134
 135------------------------------------------------
 136$ git log
 137------------------------------------------------
 138
 139If you also want to see complete diffs at each step, use
 140
 141------------------------------------------------
 142$ git log -p
 143------------------------------------------------
 144
 145Managing branches
 146-----------------
 147
 148A single git repository can maintain multiple branches of
 149development.  To create a new branch named "experimental", use
 150
 151------------------------------------------------
 152$ git branch experimental
 153------------------------------------------------
 154
 155If you now run
 156
 157------------------------------------------------
 158$ git branch
 159------------------------------------------------
 160
 161you'll get a list of all existing branches:
 162
 163------------------------------------------------
 164  experimental
 165* master
 166------------------------------------------------
 167
 168The "experimental" branch is the one you just created, and the
 169"master" branch is a default branch that was created for you
 170automatically.  The asterisk marks the branch you are currently on;
 171type
 172
 173------------------------------------------------
 174$ git checkout experimental
 175------------------------------------------------
 176
 177to switch to the experimental branch.  Now edit a file, commit the
 178change, and switch back to the master branch:
 179
 180------------------------------------------------
 181(edit file)
 182$ git commit -a
 183$ git checkout master
 184------------------------------------------------
 185
 186Check that the change you made is no longer visible, since it was
 187made on the experimental branch and you're back on the master branch.
 188
 189You can make a different change on the master branch:
 190
 191------------------------------------------------
 192(edit file)
 193$ git commit -a
 194------------------------------------------------
 195
 196at this point the two branches have diverged, with different changes
 197made in each.  To merge the changes made in experimental into master, run
 198
 199------------------------------------------------
 200$ git pull . experimental
 201------------------------------------------------
 202
 203If the changes don't conflict, you're done.  If there are conflicts,
 204markers will be left in the problematic files showing the conflict;
 205
 206------------------------------------------------
 207$ git diff
 208------------------------------------------------
 209
 210will show this.  Once you've edited the files to resolve the
 211conflicts,
 212
 213------------------------------------------------
 214$ git commit -a
 215------------------------------------------------
 216
 217will commit the result of the merge. Finally,
 218
 219------------------------------------------------
 220$ gitk
 221------------------------------------------------
 222
 223will show a nice graphical representation of the resulting history.
 224
 225If you develop on a branch crazy-idea, then regret it, you can always
 226delete the branch with
 227
 228-------------------------------------
 229$ git branch -D crazy-idea
 230-------------------------------------
 231
 232Branches are cheap and easy, so this is a good way to try something
 233out.
 234
 235Using git for collaboration
 236---------------------------
 237
 238Suppose that Alice has started a new project with a git repository in
 239/home/alice/project, and that Bob, who has a home directory on the
 240same machine, wants to contribute.
 241
 242Bob begins with:
 243
 244------------------------------------------------
 245$ git clone /home/alice/project myrepo
 246------------------------------------------------
 247
 248This creates a new directory "myrepo" containing a clone of Alice's
 249repository.  The clone is on an equal footing with the original
 250project, possessing its own copy of the original project's history.
 251
 252Bob then makes some changes and commits them:
 253
 254------------------------------------------------
 255(edit files)
 256$ git commit -a
 257(repeat as necessary)
 258------------------------------------------------
 259
 260When he's ready, he tells Alice to pull changes from the repository
 261at /home/bob/myrepo.  She does this with:
 262
 263------------------------------------------------
 264$ cd /home/alice/project
 265$ git pull /home/bob/myrepo master
 266------------------------------------------------
 267
 268This merges the changes from Bob's "master" branch into Alice's
 269current branch.  If Alice has made her own changes in the meantime,
 270then she may need to manually fix any conflicts.  (Note that the
 271"master" argument in the above command is actually unnecessary, as it
 272is the default.)
 273
 274The "pull" command thus performs two operations: it fetches changes
 275from a remote branch, then merges them into the current branch.
 276
 277You can perform the first operation alone using the "git fetch"
 278command.  For example, Alice could create a temporary branch just to
 279track Bob's changes, without merging them with her own, using:
 280
 281-------------------------------------
 282$ git fetch /home/bob/myrepo master:bob-incoming
 283-------------------------------------
 284
 285which fetches the changes from Bob's master branch into a new branch
 286named bob-incoming.  Then
 287
 288-------------------------------------
 289$ git log -p master..bob-incoming
 290-------------------------------------
 291
 292shows a list of all the changes that Bob made since he branched from
 293Alice's master branch.
 294
 295After examining those changes, and possibly fixing things, Alice
 296could pull the changes into her master branch:
 297
 298-------------------------------------
 299$ git checkout master
 300$ git pull . bob-incoming
 301-------------------------------------
 302
 303The last command is a pull from the "bob-incoming" branch in Alice's
 304own repository.
 305
 306Alice could also perform both steps at once with:
 307
 308-------------------------------------
 309$ git pull /home/bob/myrepo master:bob-incoming
 310-------------------------------------
 311
 312This is just like the "git pull /home/bob/myrepo master" that we saw
 313before, except that it also stores the unmerged changes from bob's
 314master branch in bob-incoming before merging them into Alice's
 315current branch.  Note that git pull always merges into the current
 316branch, regardless of what else is given on the commandline.
 317
 318Later, Bob can update his repo with Alice's latest changes using
 319
 320-------------------------------------
 321$ git pull
 322-------------------------------------
 323
 324Note that he doesn't need to give the path to Alice's repository;
 325when Bob cloned Alice's repository, git stored the location of her
 326repository in the file .git/remotes/origin, and that location is used
 327as the default for pulls.
 328
 329Bob may also notice a branch in his repository that he didn't create:
 330
 331-------------------------------------
 332$ git branch
 333* master
 334  origin
 335-------------------------------------
 336
 337The "origin" branch, which was created automatically by "git clone",
 338is a pristine copy of Alice's master branch; Bob should never commit
 339to it.
 340
 341If Bob later decides to work from a different host, he can still
 342perform clones and pulls using the ssh protocol:
 343
 344-------------------------------------
 345$ git clone alice.org:/home/alice/project myrepo
 346-------------------------------------
 347
 348Alternatively, git has a native protocol, or can use rsync or http;
 349see gitlink:git-pull[1] for details.
 350
 351Git can also be used in a CVS-like mode, with a central repository
 352that various users push changes to; see gitlink:git-push[1] and
 353link:cvs-migration.html[git for CVS users].
 354
 355Exploring history
 356-----------------
 357
 358Git history is represented as a series of interrelated commits.  We
 359have already seen that the git log command can list those commits.
 360Note that first line of each git log entry also gives a name for the
 361commit:
 362
 363-------------------------------------
 364$ git log
 365commit c82a22c39cbc32576f64f5c6b3f24b99ea8149c7
 366Author: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
 367Date:   Tue May 16 17:18:22 2006 -0700
 368
 369    merge-base: Clarify the comments on post processing.
 370-------------------------------------
 371
 372We can give this name to git show to see the details about this
 373commit.
 374
 375-------------------------------------
 376$ git show c82a22c39cbc32576f64f5c6b3f24b99ea8149c7
 377-------------------------------------
 378
 379But there other ways to refer to commits.  You can use any initial
 380part of the name that is long enough to uniquely identify the commit:
 381
 382-------------------------------------
 383$ git show c82a22c39c   # the first few characters of the name are
 384                        # usually enough
 385$ git show HEAD         # the tip of the current branch
 386$ git show experimental # the tip of the "experimental" branch
 387-------------------------------------
 388
 389Every commit has at least one "parent" commit, which points to the
 390previous state of the project:
 391
 392-------------------------------------
 393$ git show HEAD^  # to see the parent of HEAD
 394$ git show HEAD^^ # to see the grandparent of HEAD
 395$ git show HEAD~4 # to see the great-great grandparent of HEAD
 396-------------------------------------
 397
 398Note that merge commits may have more than one parent:
 399
 400-------------------------------------
 401$ git show HEAD^1 # show the first parent of HEAD (same as HEAD^)
 402$ git show HEAD^2 # show the second parent of HEAD
 403-------------------------------------
 404
 405You can also give commits names of your own; after running
 406
 407-------------------------------------
 408$ git-tag v2.5 1b2e1d63ff
 409-------------------------------------
 410
 411you can refer to 1b2e1d63ff by the name "v2.5".  If you intend to
 412share this name with other people (for example, to identify a release
 413version), you should create a "tag" object, and perhaps sign it; see
 414gitlink:git-tag[1] for details.
 415
 416Any git command that needs to know a commit can take any of these
 417names.  For example:
 418
 419-------------------------------------
 420$ git diff v2.5 HEAD     # compare the current HEAD to v2.5
 421$ git branch stable v2.5 # start a new branch named "stable" based
 422                         # at v2.5
 423$ git reset --hard HEAD^ # reset your current branch and working
 424                         # directory to its state at HEAD^
 425-------------------------------------
 426
 427Be careful with that last command: in addition to losing any changes
 428in the working directory, it will also remove all later commits from
 429this branch.  If this branch is the only branch containing those
 430commits, they will be lost.  (Also, don't use "git reset" on a
 431publicly-visible branch that other developers pull from, as git will
 432be confused by history that disappears in this way.)
 433
 434The git grep command can search for strings in any version of your
 435project, so
 436
 437-------------------------------------
 438$ git grep "hello" v2.5
 439-------------------------------------
 440
 441searches for all occurrences of "hello" in v2.5.
 442
 443If you leave out the commit name, git grep will search any of the
 444files it manages in your current directory.  So
 445
 446-------------------------------------
 447$ git grep "hello"
 448-------------------------------------
 449
 450is a quick way to search just the files that are tracked by git.
 451
 452Many git commands also take sets of commits, which can be specified
 453in a number of ways.  Here are some examples with git log:
 454
 455-------------------------------------
 456$ git log v2.5..v2.6            # commits between v2.5 and v2.6
 457$ git log v2.5..                # commits since v2.5
 458$ git log --since="2 weeks ago" # commits from the last 2 weeks
 459$ git log v2.5.. Makefile       # commits since v2.5 which modify
 460                                # Makefile
 461-------------------------------------
 462
 463You can also give git log a "range" of commits where the first is not
 464necessarily an ancestor of the second; for example, if the tips of
 465the branches "stable-release" and "master" diverged from a common
 466commit some time ago, then
 467
 468-------------------------------------
 469$ git log stable..experimental
 470-------------------------------------
 471
 472will list commits made in the experimental branch but not in the
 473stable branch, while
 474
 475-------------------------------------
 476$ git log experimental..stable
 477-------------------------------------
 478
 479will show the list of commits made on the stable branch but not
 480the experimental branch.
 481
 482The "git log" command has a weakness: it must present commits in a
 483list.  When the history has lines of development that diverged and
 484then merged back together, the order in which "git log" presents
 485those commits is meaningless.
 486
 487Most projects with multiple contributors (such as the linux kernel,
 488or git itself) have frequent merges, and gitk does a better job of
 489visualizing their history.  For example,
 490
 491-------------------------------------
 492$ gitk --since="2 weeks ago" drivers/
 493-------------------------------------
 494
 495allows you to browse any commits from the last 2 weeks of commits
 496that modified files under the "drivers" directory.  (Note: you can
 497adjust gitk's fonts by holding down the control key while pressing
 498"-" or "+".)
 499
 500Finally, most commands that take filenames will optionally allow you
 501to precede any filename by a commit, to specify a particular version
 502of the file:
 503
 504-------------------------------------
 505$ git diff v2.5:Makefile HEAD:Makefile.in
 506-------------------------------------
 507
 508You can also use "git cat-file -p" to see any such file:
 509
 510-------------------------------------
 511$ git cat-file -p v2.5:Makefile
 512-------------------------------------
 513
 514Next Steps
 515----------
 516
 517This tutorial should be enough to perform basic distributed revision
 518control for your projects.  However, to fully understand the depth
 519and power of git you need to understand two simple ideas on which it
 520is based:
 521
 522  * The object database is the rather elegant system used to
 523    store the history of your project--files, directories, and
 524    commits.
 525
 526  * The index file is a cache of the state of a directory tree,
 527    used to create commits, check out working directories, and
 528    hold the various trees involved in a merge.
 529
 530link:tutorial-2.html[Part two of this tutorial] explains the object
 531database, the index file, and a few other odds and ends that you'll
 532need to make the most of git.
 533
 534If you don't want to consider with that right away, a few other
 535digressions that may be interesting at this point are:
 536
 537  * gitlink:git-format-patch[1], gitlink:git-am[1]: These convert
 538    series of git commits into emailed patches, and vice versa,
 539    useful for projects such as the linux kernel which rely heavily
 540    on emailed patches.
 541
 542  * gitlink:git-bisect[1]: When there is a regression in your
 543    project, one way to track down the bug is by searching through
 544    the history to find the exact commit that's to blame.  Git bisect
 545    can help you perform a binary search for that commit.  It is
 546    smart enough to perform a close-to-optimal search even in the
 547    case of complex non-linear history with lots of merged branches.
 548
 549  * link:everyday.html[Everyday GIT with 20 Commands Or So]
 550
 551  * link:cvs-migration.html[git for CVS users].