Documentation / git-merge.txton commit cherry-pick: fix docs describing handling of empty commits (f907282)
   1git-merge(1)
   2============
   3
   4NAME
   5----
   6git-merge - Join two or more development histories together
   7
   8
   9SYNOPSIS
  10--------
  11[verse]
  12'git merge' [-n] [--stat] [--no-commit] [--squash] [--[no-]edit]
  13        [-s <strategy>] [-X <strategy-option>] [-S[<key-id>]]
  14        [--[no-]rerere-autoupdate] [-m <msg>] [<commit>...]
  15'git merge' <msg> HEAD <commit>...
  16'git merge' --abort
  17
  18DESCRIPTION
  19-----------
  20Incorporates changes from the named commits (since the time their
  21histories diverged from the current branch) into the current
  22branch.  This command is used by 'git pull' to incorporate changes
  23from another repository and can be used by hand to merge changes
  24from one branch into another.
  25
  26Assume the following history exists and the current branch is
  27"`master`":
  28
  29------------
  30          A---B---C topic
  31         /
  32    D---E---F---G master
  33------------
  34
  35Then "`git merge topic`" will replay the changes made on the
  36`topic` branch since it diverged from `master` (i.e., `E`) until
  37its current commit (`C`) on top of `master`, and record the result
  38in a new commit along with the names of the two parent commits and
  39a log message from the user describing the changes.
  40
  41------------
  42          A---B---C topic
  43         /         \
  44    D---E---F---G---H master
  45------------
  46
  47The second syntax (<msg> `HEAD` <commit>...) is supported for
  48historical reasons.  Do not use it from the command line or in
  49new scripts.  It is the same as `git merge -m <msg> <commit>...`.
  50
  51The third syntax ("`git merge --abort`") can only be run after the
  52merge has resulted in conflicts. 'git merge --abort' will abort the
  53merge process and try to reconstruct the pre-merge state. However,
  54if there were uncommitted changes when the merge started (and
  55especially if those changes were further modified after the merge
  56was started), 'git merge --abort' will in some cases be unable to
  57reconstruct the original (pre-merge) changes. Therefore:
  58
  59*Warning*: Running 'git merge' with non-trivial uncommitted changes is
  60discouraged: while possible, it may leave you in a state that is hard to
  61back out of in the case of a conflict.
  62
  63
  64OPTIONS
  65-------
  66include::merge-options.txt[]
  67
  68-S[<keyid>]::
  69--gpg-sign[=<keyid>]::
  70        GPG-sign the resulting merge commit.
  71
  72-m <msg>::
  73        Set the commit message to be used for the merge commit (in
  74        case one is created).
  75+
  76If `--log` is specified, a shortlog of the commits being merged
  77will be appended to the specified message.
  78+
  79The 'git fmt-merge-msg' command can be
  80used to give a good default for automated 'git merge'
  81invocations.
  82
  83--[no-]rerere-autoupdate::
  84        Allow the rerere mechanism to update the index with the
  85        result of auto-conflict resolution if possible.
  86
  87--abort::
  88        Abort the current conflict resolution process, and
  89        try to reconstruct the pre-merge state.
  90+
  91If there were uncommitted worktree changes present when the merge
  92started, 'git merge --abort' will in some cases be unable to
  93reconstruct these changes. It is therefore recommended to always
  94commit or stash your changes before running 'git merge'.
  95+
  96'git merge --abort' is equivalent to 'git reset --merge' when
  97`MERGE_HEAD` is present.
  98
  99<commit>...::
 100        Commits, usually other branch heads, to merge into our branch.
 101        Specifying more than one commit will create a merge with
 102        more than two parents (affectionately called an Octopus merge).
 103+
 104If no commit is given from the command line, and if `merge.defaultToUpstream`
 105configuration variable is set, merge the remote-tracking branches
 106that the current branch is configured to use as its upstream.
 107See also the configuration section of this manual page.
 108
 109
 110PRE-MERGE CHECKS
 111----------------
 112
 113Before applying outside changes, you should get your own work in
 114good shape and committed locally, so it will not be clobbered if
 115there are conflicts.  See also linkgit:git-stash[1].
 116'git pull' and 'git merge' will stop without doing anything when
 117local uncommitted changes overlap with files that 'git pull'/'git
 118merge' may need to update.
 119
 120To avoid recording unrelated changes in the merge commit,
 121'git pull' and 'git merge' will also abort if there are any changes
 122registered in the index relative to the `HEAD` commit.  (One
 123exception is when the changed index entries are in the state that
 124would result from the merge already.)
 125
 126If all named commits are already ancestors of `HEAD`, 'git merge'
 127will exit early with the message "Already up-to-date."
 128
 129FAST-FORWARD MERGE
 130------------------
 131
 132Often the current branch head is an ancestor of the named commit.
 133This is the most common case especially when invoked from 'git
 134pull': you are tracking an upstream repository, you have committed
 135no local changes, and now you want to update to a newer upstream
 136revision.  In this case, a new commit is not needed to store the
 137combined history; instead, the `HEAD` (along with the index) is
 138updated to point at the named commit, without creating an extra
 139merge commit.
 140
 141This behavior can be suppressed with the `--no-ff` option.
 142
 143TRUE MERGE
 144----------
 145
 146Except in a fast-forward merge (see above), the branches to be
 147merged must be tied together by a merge commit that has both of them
 148as its parents.
 149
 150A merged version reconciling the changes from all branches to be
 151merged is committed, and your `HEAD`, index, and working tree are
 152updated to it.  It is possible to have modifications in the working
 153tree as long as they do not overlap; the update will preserve them.
 154
 155When it is not obvious how to reconcile the changes, the following
 156happens:
 157
 1581. The `HEAD` pointer stays the same.
 1592. The `MERGE_HEAD` ref is set to point to the other branch head.
 1603. Paths that merged cleanly are updated both in the index file and
 161   in your working tree.
 1624. For conflicting paths, the index file records up to three
 163   versions: stage 1 stores the version from the common ancestor,
 164   stage 2 from `HEAD`, and stage 3 from `MERGE_HEAD` (you
 165   can inspect the stages with `git ls-files -u`).  The working
 166   tree files contain the result of the "merge" program; i.e. 3-way
 167   merge results with familiar conflict markers `<<<` `===` `>>>`.
 1685. No other changes are made.  In particular, the local
 169   modifications you had before you started merge will stay the
 170   same and the index entries for them stay as they were,
 171   i.e. matching `HEAD`.
 172
 173If you tried a merge which resulted in complex conflicts and
 174want to start over, you can recover with `git merge --abort`.
 175
 176MERGING TAG
 177-----------
 178
 179When merging an annotated (and possibly signed) tag, Git always
 180creates a merge commit even if a fast-forward merge is possible, and
 181the commit message template is prepared with the tag message.
 182Additionally, if the tag is signed, the signature check is reported
 183as a comment in the message template. See also linkgit:git-tag[1].
 184
 185When you want to just integrate with the work leading to the commit
 186that happens to be tagged, e.g. synchronizing with an upstream
 187release point, you may not want to make an unnecessary merge commit.
 188
 189In such a case, you can "unwrap" the tag yourself before feeding it
 190to `git merge`, or pass `--ff-only` when you do not have any work on
 191your own. e.g.
 192
 193----
 194git fetch origin
 195git merge v1.2.3^0
 196git merge --ff-only v1.2.3
 197----
 198
 199
 200HOW CONFLICTS ARE PRESENTED
 201---------------------------
 202
 203During a merge, the working tree files are updated to reflect the result
 204of the merge.  Among the changes made to the common ancestor's version,
 205non-overlapping ones (that is, you changed an area of the file while the
 206other side left that area intact, or vice versa) are incorporated in the
 207final result verbatim.  When both sides made changes to the same area,
 208however, Git cannot randomly pick one side over the other, and asks you to
 209resolve it by leaving what both sides did to that area.
 210
 211By default, Git uses the same style as the one used by the "merge" program
 212from the RCS suite to present such a conflicted hunk, like this:
 213
 214------------
 215Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
 216ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
 217<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
 218Conflict resolution is hard;
 219let's go shopping.
 220=======
 221Git makes conflict resolution easy.
 222>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
 223And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
 224------------
 225
 226The area where a pair of conflicting changes happened is marked with markers
 227`<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>`.  The part before the `=======`
 228is typically your side, and the part afterwards is typically their side.
 229
 230The default format does not show what the original said in the conflicting
 231area.  You cannot tell how many lines are deleted and replaced with
 232Barbie's remark on your side.  The only thing you can tell is that your
 233side wants to say it is hard and you'd prefer to go shopping, while the
 234other side wants to claim it is easy.
 235
 236An alternative style can be used by setting the "merge.conflictstyle"
 237configuration variable to "diff3".  In "diff3" style, the above conflict
 238may look like this:
 239
 240------------
 241Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
 242ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.
 243<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
 244Conflict resolution is hard;
 245let's go shopping.
 246|||||||
 247Conflict resolution is hard.
 248=======
 249Git makes conflict resolution easy.
 250>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
 251And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
 252------------
 253
 254In addition to the `<<<<<<<`, `=======`, and `>>>>>>>` markers, it uses
 255another `|||||||` marker that is followed by the original text.  You can
 256tell that the original just stated a fact, and your side simply gave in to
 257that statement and gave up, while the other side tried to have a more
 258positive attitude.  You can sometimes come up with a better resolution by
 259viewing the original.
 260
 261
 262HOW TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS
 263------------------------
 264
 265After seeing a conflict, you can do two things:
 266
 267 * Decide not to merge.  The only clean-ups you need are to reset
 268   the index file to the `HEAD` commit to reverse 2. and to clean
 269   up working tree changes made by 2. and 3.; `git merge --abort`
 270   can be used for this.
 271
 272 * Resolve the conflicts.  Git will mark the conflicts in
 273   the working tree.  Edit the files into shape and
 274   'git add' them to the index.  Use 'git commit' to seal the deal.
 275
 276You can work through the conflict with a number of tools:
 277
 278 * Use a mergetool.  `git mergetool` to launch a graphical
 279   mergetool which will work you through the merge.
 280
 281 * Look at the diffs.  `git diff` will show a three-way diff,
 282   highlighting changes from both the `HEAD` and `MERGE_HEAD`
 283   versions.
 284
 285 * Look at the diffs from each branch. `git log --merge -p <path>`
 286   will show diffs first for the `HEAD` version and then the
 287   `MERGE_HEAD` version.
 288
 289 * Look at the originals.  `git show :1:filename` shows the
 290   common ancestor, `git show :2:filename` shows the `HEAD`
 291   version, and `git show :3:filename` shows the `MERGE_HEAD`
 292   version.
 293
 294
 295EXAMPLES
 296--------
 297
 298* Merge branches `fixes` and `enhancements` on top of
 299  the current branch, making an octopus merge:
 300+
 301------------------------------------------------
 302$ git merge fixes enhancements
 303------------------------------------------------
 304
 305* Merge branch `obsolete` into the current branch, using `ours`
 306  merge strategy:
 307+
 308------------------------------------------------
 309$ git merge -s ours obsolete
 310------------------------------------------------
 311
 312* Merge branch `maint` into the current branch, but do not make
 313  a new commit automatically:
 314+
 315------------------------------------------------
 316$ git merge --no-commit maint
 317------------------------------------------------
 318+
 319This can be used when you want to include further changes to the
 320merge, or want to write your own merge commit message.
 321+
 322You should refrain from abusing this option to sneak substantial
 323changes into a merge commit.  Small fixups like bumping
 324release/version name would be acceptable.
 325
 326
 327include::merge-strategies.txt[]
 328
 329CONFIGURATION
 330-------------
 331include::merge-config.txt[]
 332
 333branch.<name>.mergeoptions::
 334        Sets default options for merging into branch <name>. The syntax and
 335        supported options are the same as those of 'git merge', but option
 336        values containing whitespace characters are currently not supported.
 337
 338SEE ALSO
 339--------
 340linkgit:git-fmt-merge-msg[1], linkgit:git-pull[1],
 341linkgit:gitattributes[5],
 342linkgit:git-reset[1],
 343linkgit:git-diff[1], linkgit:git-ls-files[1],
 344linkgit:git-add[1], linkgit:git-rm[1],
 345linkgit:git-mergetool[1]
 346
 347GIT
 348---
 349Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite