refs: improve comments about "reading" argument of "resolve_ref"

The existing in-code comment was misleading.  An access that is not
"reading" may often be "writing", but it does not have to be.

Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
index 39a3b23804d2da715c564459bf320be23d41c1bf..b6807505e243fd26cae50460bc003254406ae7e5 100644 (file)
--- a/refs.c
+++ b/refs.c
@@ -390,6 +390,18 @@ int resolve_gitlink_ref(const char *path, const char *refname, unsigned char *re
        return retval;
 }
 
        return retval;
 }
 

+/*
+ * If the "reading" argument is set, this function finds out what _object_
+ * the ref points at by "reading" the ref.  The ref, if it is not symbolic,
+ * has to exist, and if it is symbolic, it has to point at an existing ref,
+ * because the "read" goes through the symref to the ref it points at.
+ *
+ * The access that is not "reading" may often be "writing", but does not
+ * have to; it can be merely checking _where it leads to_. If it is a
+ * prelude to "writing" to the ref, a write to a symref that points at
+ * yet-to-be-born ref will create the real ref pointed by the symref.
+ * reading=0 allows the caller to check where such a symref leads to.
+ */

 const char *resolve_ref(const char *ref, unsigned char *sha1, int reading, int *flag)
 {
        int depth = MAXDEPTH;
 const char *resolve_ref(const char *ref, unsigned char *sha1, int reading, int *flag)
 {
        int depth = MAXDEPTH;


@@ -409,13 +421,7 @@ const char *resolve_ref(const char *ref, unsigned char *sha1, int reading, int *
                if (--depth < 0)
                        return NULL;
 
                if (--depth < 0)
                        return NULL;
 

-               /* Special case: non-existing file.
-                * Not having the refs/heads/new-branch is OK
-                * if we are writing into it, so is .git/HEAD
-                * that points at refs/heads/master still to be
-                * born.  It is NOT OK if we are resolving for
-                * reading.
-                */
+               /* Special case: non-existing file. */

                if (lstat(path, &st) < 0) {
                        struct ref_list *list = get_packed_refs();
                        while (list) {
                if (lstat(path, &st) < 0) {
                        struct ref_list *list = get_packed_refs();
                        while (list) {