pkt-line: move a misplaced comment

The comment describing the packet writing interface was
originally written above packet_write, but migrated to be
above safe_write in f3a3214, probably because it is meant to
generally describe the packet writing interface and not a
single function. Let's move it into the header file, where
users of the interface are more likely to see it.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

diff --git a/pkt-line.c b/pkt-line.c
index eaba15f124b5d8247d39bd0844967cb5a9101ba8..5138f47b645325592b3403b48b2282b94b5269d7 100644 (file)
--- a/pkt-line.c
+++ b/pkt-line.c
@@ -46,21 +46,6 @@ static void packet_trace(const char *buf, unsigned int len, int write)
        strbuf_release(&out);
 }
 
-/*
- * Write a packetized stream, where each line is preceded by
- * its length (including the header) as a 4-byte hex number.
- * A length of 'zero' means end of stream (and a length of 1-3
- * would be an error).
- *
- * This is all pretty stupid, but we use this packetized line
- * format to make a streaming format possible without ever
- * over-running the read buffers. That way we'll never read
- * into what might be the pack data (which should go to another
- * process entirely).
- *
- * The writing side could use stdio, but since the reading
- * side can't, we stay with pure read/write interfaces.
- */
 ssize_t safe_write(int fd, const void *buf, ssize_t n)
 {
        ssize_t nn = n;

diff --git a/pkt-line.h b/pkt-line.h
index 8cfeb0c31c8661bf11ce78d3679a21cd030ffb75..7a67e9c65be2621bff63d6828c59f13d87c4a583 100644 (file)
--- a/pkt-line.h
+++ b/pkt-line.h
@@ -5,7 +5,19 @@
 #include "strbuf.h"
 
 /*
- * Silly packetized line writing interface
+ * Write a packetized stream, where each line is preceded by
+ * its length (including the header) as a 4-byte hex number.
+ * A length of 'zero' means end of stream (and a length of 1-3
+ * would be an error).
+ *
+ * This is all pretty stupid, but we use this packetized line
+ * format to make a streaming format possible without ever
+ * over-running the read buffers. That way we'll never read
+ * into what might be the pack data (which should go to another
+ * process entirely).
+ *
+ * The writing side could use stdio, but since the reading
+ * side can't, we stay with pure read/write interfaces.
  */
 void packet_flush(int fd);
 void packet_write(int fd, const char *fmt, ...) __attribute__((format (printf, 2, 3)));