Andrew's git
/
gitweb.git
/ diff
summary
|
log
|
commit
| diff |
tree
commit
grep
author
committer
pickaxe
?
re
default pull: forget about "newbie protection" for now.
author
Junio C Hamano
<junkio@cox.net>
Fri, 22 Dec 2006 23:25:21 +0000
(15:25 -0800)
committer
Junio C Hamano
<junkio@cox.net>
Fri, 22 Dec 2006 23:25:21 +0000
(15:25 -0800)
This will not be backward compatible no matter how you cut it.
Shelve it for now until somebody comes up with a better way to
determine when we can safely refuse to use the first set of
branchse for merging without upsetting valid workflows.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
git-parse-remote.sh
patch
|
blob
|
history
raw
|
patch
| inline |
side by side
(parent:
228e2eb
)
diff --git
a/git-parse-remote.sh
b/git-parse-remote.sh
index f163821d033cc0dc81dcd7ce0af13a7e75986db1..b163d22ddbd88dc061ac905fc650929eb6f67cc1 100755
(executable)
--- a/
git-parse-remote.sh
+++ b/
git-parse-remote.sh
@@
-145,13
+145,6
@@
canon_refs_list_for_fetch () {
merge_branches=$(git-repo-config \
--get-all "branch.${curr_branch}.merge")
fi
- # If we are fetching only one branch, then first branch
- # is the only thing that makes sense to merge anyway,
- # so there is no point refusing that traditional rule.
- if test $# != 1 && test "z$merge_branches" = z
- then
- merge_branches=..this..would..never..match..
- fi
fi
for ref
do