Merge branch 'rt/commentchar-fmt-merge-msg' into maint
* rt/commentchar-fmt-merge-msg:
t6200: avoid path mangling issue on Windows
fmt-merge-msg: use core.commentchar in tag signatures completely
fmt-merge-msg: respect core.commentchar in people credits
Do not just randomly synchronize the revisions with no checks at
all.
I don't have any evidence that there's anything wrong with the
current code, which Bazaar seems to use, but for different purposes.
Let's use the logic Bazaar UI uses to avoid surprises.
Also, add a non-ff check.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
pretty: simplify output line length calculation in pp_user_info()
Keep namelen unchanged and don't use it to hold a value that we're not
interested in anyway -- we can use maillen and the constant part
directly instead. This simplifies the code slightly and prepares for
the next patch that makes use of the original value of namelen.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
pretty: simplify input line length calculation in pp_user_info()
Instead of searching for LF and NUL with two strchr() calls use a single
strchrnul() call. We don't need to check if the returned pointer is NULL
because either we'll find the NUL at the end of line, or the caller
forgot to NUL-terminate the string and we'll overrun the buffer in any
case. Also we don't need to pass LF or NUL to split_ident_line() as it
ignores it anyway.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Earlier we added support for --expire=all (or --expire=now) that
considers all crufts, regardless of their age, as eligible for
garbage collection by turning command argument parsers that use
approxidate() to use parse_expiry_date(), but "git prune" used a
built-in parse-options facility OPT_DATE() and did not benefit from
the new function.
It is not a portable expectation that a single-shot environment
variable assignment works when calling a shell function, not a
command.
Set and export the variable before calling "test_must_fail git push"
instead. This change would not hurt because this is the last
command in the subprocess and the environment will not seep through
to later tests without using a single-shot assignment.
bash-prompt.sh: show where rebase is at when stopped
When a rebase stops (e.g. interrupted by a merge conflict), it could
be useful to know how far a rebase has progressed and how many
commits in total this rebase will apply. Teach the __git_ps1()
command to display the number of commits so far applied and the
total number of commits to be applied, like this:
In the example above the rebase has stopped at the second commit due to
a merge conflict and there are a total number of five commits to be
applied by this rebase.
This information can be already obtained from the following files which are
being generated during the rebase:
"git merge $(git rev-parse v1.8.2)" behaved quite differently from
"git merge v1.8.2", as if v1.8.2 were written as v1.8.2^0 and did
not pay much attention to the annotated tag payload. Make the code
notice the type of the tag object, in addition to the dwim_ref()
based classification the current code uses (i.e. the name appears in
refs/tags/) to decide when to special case merging of tags.
* jc/merge-tag-object:
t6200: test message for merging of an annotated tag
t6200: use test_config/test_unconfig
merge: a random object may not necssarily be a commit
completion: remove duplicate block for "git commit -c"
Remove one of two consecutive, identical blocks for "git commit -c".
This was caused by a mechanical mismerge at d931e2fb252e (Merge
branch 'mp/complete-paths', 2013-02-08). The side branch wanted to
add this block at fea16b47 but the same fix was done independently
at 685397585 already.
Signed-off-by: Mårten Kongstad <marten.kongstad@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
remote: 'show' and 'prune' can take more than one remote
The 'git remote show' and 'prune' subcommands are documented as taking
only a single remote name argument, but that is not the case; they
will simply iterate the action over all remotes given. Update the
documentation and tests to match.
With the last user of the -f flag gone, we also remove the code
supporting it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
remote: add a test for extra arguments, according to docs
This adds one test or comment for each subcommand of git-remote
according to its current documentation. All but 'set-branches' and
'update' are listed as taking only a fixed number of arguments; for
those we can write a test with one more (bogus) argument, and see if
the command notices that.
They fail on several counts: 'add' does not check for extra arguments,
and 'show' and 'prune' actually iterate over remotes (i.e., take any
number of args). We'll fix them in the next two patches.
The -f machinery is only there to make the tests readable while still
ensuring they pass as a whole, and will be removed in the final patch.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
cherry-pick/revert: make usage say '<commit-ish>...'
The usage string for cherry-pick and revert has never been updated to
reflect their ability to handle multiple commits. Other documentation is
already correct.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we 'git rebase $upstream', git uses 'rev-parse --verify
$current_branch' to find ORIG_HEAD. But if $current_branch
is ambiguous, 'rev-parse --verify' emits a warning and returns
a SHA1 anyway. When the wrong ambiguous choice is used,
git-rebase fails non-gracefully: it emits a warning about
failing to lock $current_branch, an error about being unable to
checkout $current_branch again, and it might even decide the
rebase is a fast-forward when it is not.
In the 'rebase $upstream' case, we already know the unambiguous
spelling of $current_branch is "HEAD". Fix git-rebase to find
$orig_head unambiguously.
Add a test in t3400-rebase.sh which creates an ambiguous branch
name and rebases it implicitly with 'git rebase $other'.
Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <hordp@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
pretty-printing body of the commit that is stored in non UTF-8
encoding did not work well. The early part of this series fixes
it. And then it adds %C(auto) specifier that turns the coloring on
when we are emitting to the terminal, and adds column-aligning
format directives.
* nd/pretty-formats:
pretty: support %>> that steal trailing spaces
pretty: support truncating in %>, %< and %><
pretty: support padding placeholders, %< %> and %><
pretty: add %C(auto) for auto-coloring
pretty: split color parsing into a separate function
pretty: two phase conversion for non utf-8 commits
utf8.c: add reencode_string_len() that can handle NULs in string
utf8.c: add utf8_strnwidth() with the ability to skip ansi sequences
utf8.c: move display_mode_esc_sequence_len() for use by other functions
pretty: share code between format_decoration and show_decorations
pretty-formats.txt: wrap long lines
pretty: get the correct encoding for --pretty:format=%e
pretty: save commit encoding from logmsg_reencode if the caller needs it
Fixes a handful of issues in the code to traverse working tree to
find untracked and/or ignored files, cleans up and optimizes the
codepath in general.
* kb/status-ignored-optim-2:
dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't scan the work tree twice
dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't scan the work tree three times
dir.c: git-status: avoid is_excluded checks for tracked files
dir.c: replace is_path_excluded with now equivalent is_excluded API
dir.c: unify is_excluded and is_path_excluded APIs
dir.c: move prep_exclude
dir.c: factor out parts of last_exclude_matching for later reuse
dir.c: git-clean -d -X: don't delete tracked directories
dir.c: make 'git-status --ignored' work within leading directories
dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't list empty directories as ignored
dir.c: git-ls-files --directories: don't hide empty directories
dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't list empty ignored directories
dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't list files in ignored directories
dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't drop ignored directories
* jn/gitweb-install-doc:
gitweb/INSTALL: GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM is for backward compatibility
gitweb/INSTALL: Simplify description of GITWEB_CONFIG_SYSTEM
When receive-pack detects error in the pack header it received in
order to decide which of unpack-objects or index-pack to run, it
returned without closing the error stream, which led to a hang
sideband thread.
* jk/receive-pack-deadlocks-with-early-failure:
receive-pack: close sideband fd on early pack errors
bisect: Log possibly bad, skipped commits at bisection end
If the bisection completes with only skipped commits left to as possible
first bad commit, output the list of possible first bad commits to human
readers of the bisection log.
Signed-off-by: Torstein Hegge <hegge@resisty.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There's no functional change since mercurial commit operation strips
that anyway, but that's no excuse for us not to do the right thing. So
let's be explicit about it.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
So that we can find already exported ones. We can never be 100% sure
that we already exported such data, due to mercurial design, it at least
sometimes we should detect them, and so should give us some performance
boost.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There's no point in calling the tag method for such simple action. Not
that we care much about the hg-git compat mode, it's mostly just for
comparison testing purposes.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git add: --ignore-removal is a better named --no-all
In the historical context of "git add --all ." that pays attention
to "all kinds of changes" (implying "without ignoring removals"),
the option to countermand it "--no-all" may have made sense, but
because we will be making "--all" the default when a pathspec is
given, it makes more sense to rename the option to a more explicit
"--ignore-removal". The "--all" option naturally becomes its
negation, "--no-ignore-removal".
* ta/glossary:
glossary: improve definitions of refspec and pathspec
The name of the hash function is "SHA-1", not "SHA1"
glossary: improve description of SHA-1 related topics
glossary: remove outdated/misleading/irrelevant entries
Improve documentation to illustrate "push authenticated, fetch
anonymous" configuration for smart HTTP servers.
* jk/doc-http-backend:
doc/http-backend: match query-string in apache half-auth example
doc/http-backend: give some lighttpd config examples
doc/http-backend: clarify "half-auth" repo configuration
Preparatory steps to make "git add <pathspec>" take notice of
removed paths that match <pathspec> by default in Git 2.0.
* 'jc/add-2.0-delete-default' (early part):
git add: rephrase the "removal will cease to be ignored" warning
git add: rework the logic to warn "git add <pathspec>..." default change
git add: start preparing for "git add <pathspec>..." to default to "-A"
builtin/add.c: simplify boolean variables
A commit object whose author or committer ident are malformed
crashed some code that trusted that a name, an email and an
timestamp can always be found in it.
zlib: fix compilation failures with Sun C Compilaer
Do this by removing a couple of useless return statements. Without this
change, compilation with Sun C Compiler 5.9 (SunOS_i386 Patch 124868-15
2010/08/11) fails with the following message:
"zlib.c", line 192: void function cannot return value
"zlib.c", line 201: void function cannot return value
cc: acomp failed for zlib.c
Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
builtin/shortlog.c: make usage string consistent with log
"--" is used to separate pathspecs from the rev specs, and not rev
specs from the options, as the shortlog_usage string currently
indicates. In correcting this usage string, make it consistent with
the log_usage string.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-shortlog.txt: make SYNOPSIS match log, update OPTIONS
There are broadly two problems with the current SYNOPSIS. First, it
completely omits the detail that paths can be specified. Second, it
attempts to list all the options: this is futile as, in addition to
the options unique to it, it accepts all the options that git-rev-list
accepts. In fixing these problems, make the SYNOPSIS consistent with
that in git-log.txt. Also add the corresponding sections to OPTIONS.
Save adding the options from rev-list-options.txt for a later patch,
as it requires some work to pick out the options that are relevant to
shortlog.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-log.txt: rewrite note on why "--" may be required
In its current form, the note talks about separating options from
"branch names" and "refnames" in the same sentence. This is entirely
inaccurate, as <revision range> need not be a set of branch names or
ref names. Rewrite it to use the word "revision range", to be
consistent with the SYNOPSIS.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'<since>..<until>' is misleading, as there are many other forms that
'git log' can accept as an argument. Replace it with <revision range>,
referring to the section "Specifying Ranges" in revisions.txt, and
rewrite the section appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-log.txt: order OPTIONS properly; move <since>..<until>
The OPTIONS section lists <since>..<until> as the first item, but this
is inconsistent with the ordering in SYNOPSIS. Move it down until it
appears just before [[--] <path>...].
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git add: rephrase the "removal will cease to be ignored" warning
Now the logic to decide when to warn has been tightened, we know the
user is in a situation where the current and future behaviours will
be different. Spell out what happens with these two versions and
how to explicitly ask for the behaviour, and suggest "git status" as
a way to inspect the current status.
The second paragraph of the added description for the -L option
"<start> and <end> can take one of these forms:", and the list of
forms that follow the headline, were indented one level too short,
due to the missing "+" to signal that the next paragraph continues
the previous one.
Also "You can specify this option more than once" is about the -L
option, not about its various forms of starting and ending points.
Move it to the end of the main text.
The current definition of 'revision' sounds like it is saying that a
revision is a tree object. In reality it is just a commit.
This should be especially useful for people used to other revision
control systems trying to see how familiar concepts translate into git
terms.
Reported-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* ta/glossary:
glossary: improve definitions of refspec and pathspec
The name of the hash function is "SHA-1", not "SHA1"
glossary: improve description of SHA-1 related topics
glossary: remove outdated/misleading/irrelevant entries
Improve documentation to illustrate "push authenticated, fetch
anonymous" configuration for smart HTTP servers.
* jk/doc-http-backend:
doc/http-backend: match query-string in apache half-auth example
doc/http-backend: give some lighttpd config examples
doc/http-backend: clarify "half-auth" repo configuration
Reduce duplicated code between convert.c and attr.c.
* lf/read-blob-data-from-index:
convert.c: remove duplicate code
read_blob_data_from_index(): optionally return the size of blob data
attr.c: extract read_index_data() as read_blob_data_from_index()
We signal presense of untracked files by adding a per-cent sign '%'
to the prompt. But because '%' is used as an escape character to
introduce prompt customization in zsh (just like bash prompt uses
'\' to escape '\u', '\h', etc.), we need to say '%%' to get a
literal per-cent.
Helped-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
glossary: Update and rephrase the definition of a remote-tracking branch
The definition of a remote-tracking branch in the glossary have been
out-of-date for a while (by e.g. referring to "Pull:" from old-style
$GIT_DIR/remotes files).
Also, the preceding patches have formalized that a remote-tracking branch
must match a configured refspec in order to be usable as an upstream.
This patch rewrites the paragraph on remote-tracking branches accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
branch.c: Validate tracking branches with refspecs instead of refs/remotes/*
The current code for validating tracking branches (e.g. the argument to
the -t/--track option) hardcodes refs/heads/* and refs/remotes/* as the
potential locations for tracking branches. This works with the refspecs
created by "git clone" or "git remote add", but is suboptimal in other
cases:
- If "refs/remotes/foo/bar" exists without any association to a remote
(i.e. there is no remote named "foo", or no remote with a refspec
that matches "refs/remotes/foo/bar"), then it is impossible to set up
a valid upstream config that tracks it. Currently, the code defaults
to using "refs/remotes/foo/bar" from repo "." as the upstream, which
works, but is probably not what the user had in mind when running
"git branch baz --track foo/bar".
- If the user has tweaked the fetch refspec for a remote to put its
remote-tracking branches outside of refs/remotes/*, e.g. by running
git config remote.foo.fetch "+refs/heads/*:refs/foo_stuff/*"
then the current code will refuse to use its remote-tracking branches
as --track arguments, since they do not match refs/remotes/*.
This patch removes the "refs/remotes/*" requirement for upstream branches,
and replaces it with explicit checking of the refspecs for each remote to
determine whether a given --track argument is a valid remote-tracking
branch. This solves both of the above problems, since the matching refspec
guarantees that there is a both a remote name and a remote branch name
that can be used for the upstream config.
However, this means that refs located within refs/remotes/* without a
corresponding remote/refspec will no longer be usable as upstreams.
The few existing tests which depended on this behavioral quirk has
already been fixed in the preceding patches.
This patch fixes the last remaining test failure in t2024-checkout-dwim.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
t9114.2: Don't use --track option against "svn-remote"-tracking branches
We are formalizing a requirement that any remote-tracking branch to be used
as an upstream (i.e. as an argument to --track), _must_ "belong" to a
configured remote by being matched by the "dst" side of a fetch refspec.
This test uses --track against a "remotes/trunk" ref which does not belong
to any configured (git) remotes, but is instead created by "git svn fetch"
operating on an svn-remote. It does not make sense to use an svn-remote as
an upstream for a local branch, as a regular "git pull" from (or "git push"
to) it would obviously fail (instead you would need to use "git svn" to
communicate with this remote). Furthermore, the usage of --track in this
case is unnecessary, since the upstreaming config that would be created is
never used.
Simply removing --track fixes the issue without changing the expected
behavior of the test.
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We are formalizing a requirement that any remote-tracking branch to be used
as an upstream (i.e. as an argument to --track), _must_ "belong" to a
configured remote by being matched by the "dst" side of a fetch refspec.
Without this patch, this test would start failing when the new behavior is
introduced.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
t3200.39: tracking setup should fail if there is no matching refspec.
We are formalizing a requirement that any remote-tracking branch to be used
as an upstream (i.e. as an argument to --track), _must_ "belong" to a
configured remote by being matched by the "dst" side of a fetch refspec.
This patch encodes the new expected behavior of this test, and marks the
test with "test_expect_failure" in anticipation of a following patch to
introduce the new behavior.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
checkout: Use remote refspecs when DWIMming tracking branches
The DWIM mode of checkout allows you to run "git checkout foo" when there
is no existing local ref or path called "foo", and there is exactly _one_
remote with a remote-tracking branch called "foo". Git will automatically
create a new local branch called "foo" using the remote-tracking "foo" as
its starting point and configured upstream.
For example, consider the following unconventional (but perfectly valid)
remote setup:
Case 1: Assume both "origin" and "frotz" have remote-tracking branches called
"foo", at "refs/remotes/origin/foo" and "refs/remotes/frotz/nitfol/foo"
respectively. In this case "git checkout foo" should fail, because there is
more than one remote with a "foo" branch.
Case 2: Assume only "frotz" have a remote-tracking branch called "foo". In
this case "git checkout foo" should succeed, and create a local branch "foo"
from "refs/remotes/frotz/nitfol/foo", using remote branch "foo" from "frotz"
as its upstream.
The current code hardcodes the assumption that all remote-tracking branches
must match the "refs/remotes/$remote/*" pattern (which is true for remotes
with "conventional" refspecs, but not true for the "frotz" remote above).
When running "git checkout foo", the current code looks for exactly one ref
matching "refs/remotes/*/foo", hence in the above example, it fails to find
"refs/remotes/frotz/nitfol/foo", which causes it to fail both case #1 and #2.
The better way to handle the above example is to actually study the fetch
refspecs to deduce the candidate remote-tracking branches for "foo"; i.e.
assume "foo" is a remote branch being fetched, and then map "refs/heads/foo"
through the refspecs in order to get the corresponding remote-tracking
branches "refs/remotes/origin/foo" and "refs/remotes/frotz/nitfol/foo".
Finally we check which of these happens to exist in the local repo, and
if there is exactly one, we have an unambiguous match for "git checkout foo",
and may proceed.
This fixes most of the failing tests introduced in the previous patch.
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>