The term "index" is translated as "Staging-Area" to
match a majority of German books and to not confuse
Git beginners who don't know about Git's index.
"Staging Area" is used in German books as a thing where
content can be staged for commit. While the translation
is good for those kind of messages, it's bad for messages
that mean the Git index as the tree state or the index
file, in which case we should translate as "Index".
send-email: suppress meaningless whitespaces in from field
Remove leading and trailing whitespaces in from field before
interepreting it to improve consistency with other options. The
split_addrs function already take care of trailing and leading
whitespaces for to, cc and bcc fields.
The from option now:
- has the same behavior when passing arguments like
" jdoe@example.com ", "\t jdoe@example.com " or
"jdoe@example.com".
- interprets aliases in string containing leading and trailing
whitespaces such as " alias" or "alias\t" like other options.
Signed-off-by: Remi Lespinet <remi.lespinet@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
send-email: allow multiple emails using --cc, --to and --bcc
Accept a list of emails separated by commas in flags --cc, --to and
--bcc. Multiple addresses can already be given by using these options
multiple times, but it is more convenient to allow cutting-and-pasting
a list of addresses from the header of an existing e-mail message,
which already lists them as comma-separated list, as a value to a
single parameter.
Remove the limitation imposed by 79ee555b (Check and document the
options to prevent mistakes, 2006-06-21) which rejected every argument
with comma in --cc, --to and --bcc.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Lienard--Mayor <Mathieu.Lienard--Mayor@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Jorge Juan Garcia Garcia <Jorge-Juan.Garcia-Garcia@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Remi Lespinet <remi.lespinet@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
checkout: retire --ignore-other-worktrees in favor of --force
As a safeguard, checking out a branch already checked out by a different
worktree is disallowed. This behavior can be overridden with
--ignore-other-worktrees, however, this option is neither obvious nor
particularly discoverable. As a common safeguard override, --force is
more likely to come to mind. Therefore, overload it to also suppress the
check for a branch already checked out elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
worktree: add: auto-vivify new branch when <branch> is omitted
As a convenience, when <branch> is omitted from "git worktree <path>
<branch>" and neither -b nor -B is used, automatically create a new
branch named after <path>, as if "-b $(basename <path>)" was specified.
Thus, "git worktree add ../hotfix" creates a new branch named "hotfix"
and associates it with new worktree "../hotfix".
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
worktree: add: make -b/-B default to HEAD when <branch> is omitted
As a convenience, like "git branch" and "git checkout -b", make
"git worktree add -b <newbranch> <path> <branch>" default to HEAD when
<branch> is omitted.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In order to allow linked worktree creation via "git checkout --to" from
a bare repository, 3473ad0 (checkout: don't require a work tree when
checking out into a new one, 2014-11-30) dropped git-checkout's
unconditional NEED_WORK_TREE requirement and instead performed worktree
setup conditionally based upon presence or absence of the --to option.
Now that --to has been retired and git-checkout is no longer responsible
for linked worktree creation, the NEED_WORK_TREE requirement can be
re-instated.
This effectively reverts 3473ad0, except for the tests it added which
now check bare repository behavior of "git worktree add" instead.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that "git worktree add" has achieved user-facing feature-parity with
"git checkout --to", retire the latter.
Move the actual linked worktree creation functionality,
prepare_linked_checkout() and its helpers, verbatim from checkout.c to
worktree.c.
This effectively reverts changes to checkout.c by 529fef2 (checkout:
support checking out into a new working directory, 2014-11-30) with the
exception of merge_working_tree() and switch_branches() which still
require specialized knowledge that a the checkout is occurring in a
newly-created linked worktree (signaled to them by the private
GIT_CHECKOUT_NEW_WORKTREE environment variable).
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
tests: worktree: retrofit "checkout --to" tests for "worktree add"
With the introduction of "git worktree add", "git checkout --to" is
slated for removal. Therefore, retrofit linked worktree creation tests
to use "git worktree add" instead.
(The test to check exclusivity of "checkout --to" and "checkout <paths>"
is dropped altogether since it becomes meaningless with retirement of
"checkout --to".)
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
One of git-worktree's roles is to populate the new worktree, much like
git-checkout, and thus, for convenience, ought to support several of the
same shortcuts. Toward this goal, add -b/-B options to create a new
branch and check it out in the new worktree.
(For brevity, only -b is mentioned in the synopsis; -B is omitted.)
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
One of git-worktree's roles is to populate the new worktree, much like
git-checkout, and thus, for convenience, ought to support several of the
same shortcuts. Toward this goal, add a --detach option to detach HEAD
in the new worktree.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
By default, "git worktree add" refuses to create a new worktree when
the requested branch is already checked out elsewhere. Add a --force
option to override this safeguard.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The plan is to relocate "git checkout --to" functionality to "git
worktree add". As a first step, introduce a bare-bones git-worktree
"add" command along with documentation. At this stage, "git worktree
add" merely invokes "git checkout --to" behind the scenes, but an
upcoming patch will move the actual functionality
(checkout.c:prepare_linked_checkout() and its helpers) to worktree.c.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
checkout: drop 'checkout_opts' dependency from prepare_linked_checkout
The plan is to relocate "git checkout --to" functionality to "git
worktree add", however, worktree.c won't have access to the 'struct
checkout_opts' passed to prepare_linked_worktree(), which it consults
for the pathname of the new worktree and the argv[] of the command it
should run to populate the new worktree. Facilitate relocation of
prepare_linked_worktree() by instead having it accept the pathname and
argv[] directly, thus eliminating the final references to 'struct
checkout_opts'.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
prepare_linked_checkout() respects git-checkout's --quiet flag, however,
the plan is to relocate "git checkout --to" functionality to "git
worktree add", and git-worktree does not (yet) have a --quiet flag.
Consequently, make prepare_linked_checkout() unconditionally verbose to
ease eventual code movement to worktree.c.
(A --quiet flag can be added to git-worktree later if there is demand
for it.)
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
checkout: relocate --to's "no branch specified" check
The plan is to relocate "git checkout --to" functionality to "git
worktree add", however, this check expects a 'struct branch_info' which
git-worktree won't have at hand. It will, however, have access to its
own command-line from which it can pick up the branch name. Therefore,
as a preparatory step, rather than having prepare_linked_checkout()
perform this check, make it the caller's responsibility.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Given "git checkout --to <path> HEAD~1", the new worktree's HEAD should
begin life at the current branch's HEAD~1, however, it actually ends up
at HEAD~2. This happens because:
1. git-checkout resolves HEAD~1
2. to satisfy is_git_directory(), prepare_linked_worktree() creates
a HEAD for the new worktree with the value of the resolved HEAD~1
3. git-checkout re-invokes itself with the same arguments within the
new worktree to populate the worktree
4. the sub git-checkout resolves HEAD~1 relative to its own HEAD,
which is the resolved HEAD~1 from the original invocation,
resulting unexpectedly and incorrectly in HEAD~2 (relative to the
original)
Fix this by unconditionally assigning the current worktree's HEAD as the
value of the new worktree's HEAD.
As a side-effect, this change also eliminates a dependence within
prepare_linked_checkout() upon 'struct branch_info'. The plan is to
eventually relocate "git checkout --to" functionality to "git worktree
add", and worktree.c won't have knowledge of 'struct branch_info', so
removal of this dependency is a step toward that goal.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Due to the (current) absence of a "git worktree lock" command, locking
a worktree's administrative files to prevent automatic pruning is a
manual task, necessarily requiring low-level understanding of linked
worktree functionality. However, this level of detail does not belong
in the high-level DESCRIPTION section, so add a generalized discussion
of locking to DESCRIPTION and move the technical information to DETAILS.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation/git-worktree: split technical info from general description
The DESCRIPTION section should provide a high-level overview of linked
worktree functionality to bring users up to speed quickly, without
overloading them with low-level details, so relocate the technical
information to a new DETAILS section.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation: move linked worktree description from checkout to worktree
Now that the git-worktree command exists, its documentation page is the
natural place for the linked worktree description to reside. Relocate
the "MULTIPLE WORKING TREES" description verbatim from git-checkout.txt
to git-worktree.txt.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation/git-worktree: associate options with commands
git-worktree options affect some worktree commands but not others, but
this is not necessarily obvious from the option descriptions. Make this
clear by indicating explicitly which commands are affected by which
options.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation/branch: document -M and -D in terms of --force
Now that we have proper documentation for --force's interaction with -d
and -m, we can avoid duplication and consider -M and -D as convenience
aliases for -m --force and -d --force.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When c6458e60 (index-pack: kill union delta_base to save memory,
2015-04-18) attempted to reduce the memory footprint of index-pack,
one of the key thing it did was to keep track of ref-deltas and
ofs-deltas separately.
In fix_unresolved_deltas(), however it forgot that it now wants to
look only at ref deltas in one place. The code allocated an array
for nr_unresolved, which is sum of number of ref- and ofs-deltas
minus nr_resolved, which may be larger or smaller than the number
ref-deltas. Depending on nr_resolved, this was either under or over
allocating.
Also, the old code before this change had to use 'i' and 'n' because
some of the things we see in the (old) deltas[] array we scanned
with 'i' would not make it into the sorted_by_pos[] array in the old
world order, but now because you have only ref delta in a separate
ref_deltas[] array, they increment lock&step. We no longer need
separate variables. And most importantly, we shouldn't pass the
nr_unresolved parameter, as this number does not play a role in the
working of this helper function.
Helped-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
pager: do not leak "GIT_PAGER_IN_USE" to the pager
Since 2e6c012e (setup_pager: set GIT_PAGER_IN_USE, 2011-08-17), we
export GIT_PAGER_IN_USE so that a process that becomes the upstream
of the spawned pager can still tell that we have spawned the pager
and decide to do colored output even when its output no longer goes
to a terminal (i.e. isatty(1)).
But we forgot to clear it from the enviornment of the spawned pager.
This is not a problem in a sane world, but if you have a handful of
thousands Git users in your organization, somebody is bound to do
strange things, e.g. typing "!<ENTER>" instead of 'q' to get control
back from $LESS. GIT_PAGER_IN_USE is still set in that subshell
spawned by "less", and all sorts of interesting things starts
happening, e.g. "git diff | cat" starts coloring its output.
We can clear the environment variable in the half of the fork that
runs the pager to avoid the confusion.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation/i18n.txt: clarify character encoding support
As a "distributed" VCS, git should better define the encodings of its core
textual data structures, in particular those that are part of the network
protocol.
That git is encoding agnostic is only really true for blob objects. E.g.
the 'non-NUL bytes' requirement of tree and commit objects excludes
UTF-16/32, and the special meaning of '/' in the index file as well as
space and linefeed in commit objects eliminates EBCDIC and other non-ASCII
encodings.
Git expects bytes < 0x80 to be pure ASCII, thus CJK encodings that partly
overlap with the ASCII range are problematic as well. E.g. fmt_ident()
removes trailing 0x5C from user names on the assumption that it is ASCII
'\'. However, there are over 200 GBK double byte codes that end in 0x5C.
UTF-8 as default encoding on Linux and respective path translations in the
Mac and Windows versions have established UTF-8 NFC as de-facto standard
for path names.
Update the documentation in i18n.txt to reflect the current status-quo.
Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git fetch --depth=<depth>" and "git clone --depth=<depth>" issued
a shallow transfer request even to an upload-pack that does not
support the capability.
* me/fetch-into-shallow-safety:
fetch-pack: check for shallow if depth given
rev-list: disable --use-bitmap-index when pruning commits
The reachability bitmaps do not have enough information to
tell us which commits might have changed path "foo", so the
current code produces wrong answers for:
git rev-list --use-bitmap-index --count HEAD -- foo
(it silently ignores the "foo" limiter). Instead, we should
fall back to doing a normal traversal (it is OK to fall
back rather than complain, because --use-bitmap-index is a
pure optimization, and might not kick in for other reasons,
such as there being no bitmaps in the repository).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add tests for wildcard "path vs ref" disambiguation
Commit 28fcc0b (pathspec: avoid the need of "--" when wildcard is used -
2015-05-02) changes how the disambiguation rules work. This patch adds
some tests to demonstrate, basically, if wildcard characters are in an
argument:
- if the argument is valid extended sha-1 syntax, "--" must be used
- otherwise the argument is considered a path, even without "--"
And wildcard can appear in extended sha-1 syntax, either as part of
regex in ":/<regex>" or as the literal path in ":<path>". The latter
case is less likely to happen in real world. But if you do ":/" a lot,
you may need to type "--" more.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
send-email: allow use of aliases in the From field of --compose mode
Aliases were expanded before considering the From field of the
--compose option. This is inconsistent with other fields
(To, Cc, ...) which already support aliases.
Signed-off-by: Remi Lespinet <remi.lespinet@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Simplify code by creating a function which transform a list of strings
containing email addresses (separated by commas, comporting aliases)
into a clean list of valid email addresses.
Signed-off-by: Remi Lespinet <remi.lespinet@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
send-email: allow aliases in patch header and command script outputs
Interpret aliases in:
- Header fields of patches generated by git format-patch
(using --to, --cc, --add-header for example) or
manually modified. Example of fields in header:
To: alias1 Cc: alias2 Cc: alias3
- Outputs of command scripts specified by --cc-cmd and
--to-cmd. Example of script:
#!/bin/sh
echo alias1
echo alias2
Signed-off-by: Remi Lespinet <remi.lespinet@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
config.c: fix writing config files on Windows network shares
Renaming to an existing file doesn't work on Windows network shares if the
target file is open.
munmap() the old config file before commit_lock_file.
Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
rebase -i: do not leave a CHERRY_PICK_HEAD file behind
When skipping commits whose changes were already applied via `git rebase
--continue`, we need to clean up said file explicitly.
The same is not true for `git rebase --skip` because that will execute
`git reset --hard` as part of the "skip" handling in git-rebase.sh, even
before git-rebase--interactive.sh is called.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When rev-list's --cherry option does not detect that a patch has already
been applied upstream, an interactive rebase would offer to reapply it and
consequently stop at that patch with a failure, mentioning that the diff
is empty.
Traditionally, a `git rebase --continue` simply skips the commit in such a
situation.
However, as pointed out by Gábor Szeder, this leaves a CHERRY_PICK_HEAD
behind, making the Git prompt believe that a cherry pick is still going
on. This commit adds a test case demonstrating this bug.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We set CURLOPT_PROXYAUTH to use the most secure authentication
method available only when the user has set configuration variables
to specify a proxy. However, libcurl also supports specifying a
proxy through environment variables. In that case libcurl defaults
to only using the Basic proxy authentication method, because we do
not use CURLOPT_PROXYAUTH.
Set CURLOPT_PROXYAUTH to always use the most secure authentication
method available, even when there is no git configuration telling us
to use a proxy. This allows the user to use environment variables to
configure a proxy that requires an authentication method different
from Basic.
Signed-off-by: Enrique A. Tobis <etobis@twosigma.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The function is called only from one place, which makes sure to have
`interesting_cache` not NULL. Additionally the variable is a
dereferenced a few lines before unconditionally, which would have
resulted in a segmentation fault before hitting this check.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 23af91d (prune: strategies for linked checkouts - 2014-11-30)
adds "--worktrees" to "git prune" without realizing that "git prune" is
for object database only. This patch moves the same functionality to a
new command "git worktree".
fsck: it is OK for a tag and a commit to lack the body
When fsck validates a commit or a tag, it scans each line in the
header of the object using helper functions such as "start_with()",
etc. that work on a NUL terminated buffer, but before a1e920a0
(index-pack: terminate object buffers with NUL, 2014-12-08), the
validation functions were fed the object data in a piece of memory
that is not necessarily terminated with a NUL.
We added a helper function require_end_of_header() to be called at
the beginning of these validation functions to insist that the
object data contains an empty line before its end. The theory is
that the validating functions will notice and stop when it hits an
empty line as a normal end of header (or a required header line that
is missing) without scanning past the end of potentially not
NUL-terminated buffer.
But the theory forgot that in the older days, Git itself happily
created objects with only the header lines without a body. This
caused Git 2.2 and later to issue an unnecessary warning in some
existing repositories.
With a1e920a0, we do not need to require an empty line (or the body)
in these objects to safely parse and validate them. Drop the
offending "must have an empty line" check from this helper function,
while keeping the other check to make sure that there is no NUL in
the header part of the object, and adjust the name of the helper to
what it does accordingly.
Noticed-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
setup: set env $GIT_WORK_TREE when work tree is set, like $GIT_DIR
In the test case, we run setup_git_dir_gently() the first time to read
$GIT_DIR/config so that we can resolve aliases. We'll enter
setup_discovered_git_dir() and may or may not call set_git_dir() near
the end of the function, depending on whether the detected git dir is
".git" or not. This set_git_dir() will set env var $GIT_DIR.
For normal repo, git dir detected via setup_discovered_git_dir() will be
".git", and set_git_dir() is not called. If .git file is used however,
the git dir can't be ".git" and set_git_dir() is called and $GIT_DIR
set. This is the key of this problem.
If we expand an alias (or autocorrect command names), then
setup_git_dir_gently() is run the second time. If $GIT_DIR is not set in
the first run, we run the same setup_discovered_git_dir() as before.
Nothing to see. If it is, however, we'll enter setup_explicit_git_dir()
this time.
This is where the "fun" is. If $GIT_WORK_TREE is not set but
$GIT_DIR is, you are supposed to be at the root level of the
worktree. But if you are in a subdir "foo/bar" (real worktree's top
is "foo"), this rule bites you: your detected worktree is now
"foo/bar", even though the first run correctly detected worktree as
"foo". You get "internal error: work tree has already been set" as a
result.
Bottom line is, when $GIT_DIR is set, $GIT_WORK_TREE should be set too
unless there's no work tree. But setting $GIT_WORK_TREE inside
set_git_dir() may backfire. We don't know at that point if work tree is
already configured by the caller. So set it when work tree is
detected. It does not harm if $GIT_WORK_TREE is set while $GIT_DIR is
not.
Reported-by: Bjørnar Snoksrud <snoksrud@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "dir" variable is a pointer into the "buf" array. When
we hit the cleanup_return path, the first thing we do is
free(buf); but one of the error messages prints "dir", which
will access the memory after the free.
We can fix this by reorganizing the error path a little. We
act on the fatal, error-printing conditions first, as they
want to access memory and do not care about freeing. Then we
free any memory, and finally return.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'jk/make-fix-dependencies' into maint
Build clean-up.
* jk/make-fix-dependencies:
Makefile: silence perl/PM.stamp recipe
Makefile: avoid timestamp updates to GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS
Makefile: drop dependency between git-instaweb and gitweb
There was a dead code that used to handle "git pull --tags" and
show special-cased error message, which was made irrelevant when
the semantics of the option changed back in Git 1.9 days.
* pt/pull-tags-error-diag:
pull: remove --tags error in no merge candidates case
Merge branch 'jk/diagnose-config-mmap-failure' into maint
The configuration reader/writer uses mmap(2) interface to access
the files; when we find a directory, it barfed with "Out of memory?".
* jk/diagnose-config-mmap-failure:
xmmap(): drop "Out of memory?"
config.c: rewrite ENODEV into EISDIR when mmap fails
config.c: avoid xmmap error messages
config.c: fix mmap leak when writing config
read-cache.c: drop PROT_WRITE from mmap of index
Merge branch 'jk/squelch-missing-link-warning-for-unreachable' into maint
Recent "git prune" traverses young unreachable objects to safekeep
old objects in the reachability chain from them, which sometimes
caused error messages that are unnecessarily alarming.
* jk/squelch-missing-link-warning-for-unreachable:
suppress errors on missing UNINTERESTING links
silence broken link warnings with revs->ignore_missing_links
add quieter versions of parse_{tree,commit}
Merge branch 'mm/rebase-i-post-rewrite-exec' into maint
"git rebase -i" fired post-rewrite hook when it shouldn't (namely,
when it was told to stop sequencing with 'exec' insn).
* mm/rebase-i-post-rewrite-exec:
t5407: use <<- to align the expected output
rebase -i: fix post-rewrite hook with failed exec command
rebase -i: demonstrate incorrect behavior of post-rewrite
The improved ARRAY_SIZE macro uses BARF_UNLESS_AN_ARRAY which expands
to a valid check for recent gcc versions and to 0 for older gcc
versions but is not defined on non-gcc builds.
Non-gcc builds need this macro to expand to 0 as well. The current outer
test (defined(__GNUC__) && (__GNUC__ >= 3)) is a strictly weaker
condition than the inner test (GIT_GNUC_PREREQ(3, 1)) so we can omit the
outer test and cause the BARF_UNLESS_AN_ARRAY macro to be defined
correctly on non-gcc builds as well as gcc builds with older versions.
Signed-off-by: Charles Bailey <cbailey32@bloomberg.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
More Perforce row number limit workaround for "git p4".
* ld/p4-changes-block-size:
git-p4: fixing --changes-block-size handling
git-p4: add tests for non-numeric revision range
git-p4: test with limited p4 server results
git-p4: additional testing of --changes-block-size
"git for-each-ref" reported "missing object" for 0{40} when it
encounters a broken ref. The lack of object whose name is 0{40} is
not the problem; the ref being broken is.
* mh/reporting-broken-refs-from-for-each-ref:
read_loose_refs(): treat NULL_SHA1 loose references as broken
read_loose_refs(): simplify function logic
for-each-ref: report broken references correctly
t6301: new tests of for-each-ref error handling