Merge branch 'maint' of https://github.com/git-l10n/git-po
By Byrial Jensen (2) and others
via Jiang Xin (1) and Ralf Thielow (1)
* 'maint' of https://github.com/git-l10n/git-po:
l10n: Initial German translation
l10n: Update Simplified Chinese translation
l10n: Update git.pot (2 new messages)
l10n: Add the German translation team and initialize de.po
l10n: Add Danish team (da) to list of teams
l10n: New da.po file with 0 translations
l10n: Updated pt_PT language
When PATH contains an unreadable directory, alias expansion code did
not kick in, and failed with an error that said "git-subcmd" was not
found.
By Jeff King (1) and Ramsay Jones (1)
* jk/run-command-eacces:
run-command: treat inaccessible directories as ENOENT
compat/mingw.[ch]: Change return type of exec functions to int
The 'push to upstream' implementation was broken in some corner
cases. "git push $there" without refspec, when the current branch is
set to push to a remote different from $there, used to push to $there
using the upstream information to a remote unreleated to $there.
* jc/push-upstream-sanity:
push: error out when the "upstream" semantics does not make sense
Merge branch 'jc/maint-clean-nested-worktree-in-subdir' into maint
"git clean -d -f" (not "-d -f -f") is supposed to protect nested
working trees of independent git repositories that exist in the
current project working tree from getting removed, but the protection
applied only to such working trees that are at the top-level of the
current project by mistake.
* jc/maint-clean-nested-worktree-in-subdir:
clean: preserve nested git worktree in subdirectories
Rename detection logic used to match two empty files as renames during
merge-recursive, leading unnatural mismerges.
By Jeff King
* jk/diff-no-rename-empty:
merge-recursive: don't detect renames of empty files
teach diffcore-rename to optionally ignore empty content
make is_empty_blob_sha1 available everywhere
drop casts from users EMPTY_TREE_SHA1_BIN
Merge branch 'jc/commit-unedited-template' into maint
When "git commit --template F" errors out because the user did not
touch the message, it claimed that it aborts due to "empty message",
which was utterly wrong.
By Junio C Hamano (4) and Adam Monsen (1)
* jc/commit-unedited-template:
Documentation/git-commit: rephrase the "initial-ness" of templates
git-commit.txt: clarify -t requires editing message
commit: rephrase the error when user did not touch templated log message
commit: do not trigger bogus "has templated message edited" check
t7501: test the right kind of breakage
Merge branch 'jc/commit-hook-authorship' into maint
"git commit --author=$name" did not tell the name that was being
recorded in the resulting commit to hooks, even though it does do so
when the end user overrode the authorship via the "GIT_AUTHOR_NAME"
environment variable.
* jc/commit-hook-authorship:
commit: pass author/committer info to hooks
t7503: does pre-commit-hook learn authorship?
ident.c: add split_ident_line() to parse formatted ident line
Merge branch 'tr/maint-word-diff-regex-sticky' into maint
The regexp configured with diff.wordregex was incorrectly reused
across files.
By Thomas Rast (2) and Johannes Sixt (1)
* tr/maint-word-diff-regex-sticky:
diff: tweak a _copy_ of diff_options with word-diff
diff: refactor the word-diff setup from builtin_diff_cmd
t4034: diff.*.wordregex should not be "sticky" in --word-diff
Merge branch 'jh/notes-merge-in-git-dir-worktree' into maint
Running "notes merge --commit" failed to perform correctly when run
from any directory inside $GIT_DIR/. When "notes merge" stops with
conflicts, $GIT_DIR/NOTES_MERGE_WORKTREE is the place a user edits
to resolve it.
By Johan Herland (3) and Junio C Hamano (1)
* jh/notes-merge-in-git-dir-worktree:
notes-merge: Don't remove .git/NOTES_MERGE_WORKTREE; it may be the user's cwd
notes-merge: use opendir/readdir instead of using read_directory()
t3310: illustrate failure to "notes merge --commit" inside $GIT_DIR/
remove_dir_recursively(): Add flag for skipping removal of toplevel dir
bundle: remove stray single-quote from error message
After running rev-list --boundary to retrieve the list of boundary
commits, "git bundle create" runs its own revision walk. If in this
stage git encounters an unfamiliar option, it writes a message with an
unbalanced quotation mark:
error: unrecognized argument: --foo'
Drop the stray quote to match the "unrecognized argument: %s" message
used elsewhere and save translators some work.
This is mostly a futureproofing measure: for now, the "rev-list
--boundary" command catches most strange arguments on its own and the
above message is not seen unless you try something esoteric like "git
bundle create test.bundle --header HEAD".
Reported-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Check if we even have a parameter before checking its value. Running
this command without any arguments may not make a lot of sense, but
reacting with a segmentation fault is unduly harsh.
While we're at it, avoid casting argv by declaring it const right away.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
rebase -i continue: don't skip commits that only change submodules
When git-rebase--interactive stops due to a conflict and the only change
to be committed is in a submodule, the test for whether there is
anything to be committed ignores the staged submodule change. This
leads rebase to skip creating the commit for the change.
While unstaged submodule changes should be ignored to avoid needing to
update submodules during a rebase, it is safe to remove the
--ignore-submodules option to diff-index because --cached ensures that
it is only checking the index. This was discussed in [1] and a test is
included to ensure that unstaged changes are still ignored correctly.
* tr/cache-tree:
t0090: be prepared that 'wc -l' writes leading blanks
reset: update cache-tree data when appropriate
commit: write cache-tree data when writing index anyway
Refactor cache_tree_update idiom from commit
Test the current state of the cache-tree optimization
Add test-scrap-cache-tree
Merge branch 'cb/maint-t5541-make-server-port-portable' into maint-1.7.8
* cb/maint-t5541-make-server-port-portable:
t5541: check error message against the real port number used
remote-curl: Fix push status report when all branches fail
Merge branch 'tr/maint-bundle-boundary' into maint-1.7.8
* tr/maint-bundle-boundary:
bundle: keep around names passed to add_pending_object()
t5510: ensure we stay in the toplevel test dir
t5510: refactor bundle->pack conversion
Merge branch 'tr/maint-bundle-long-subject' into maint-1.7.8
* tr/maint-bundle-long-subject:
t5704: match tests to modern style
strbuf: improve strbuf_get*line documentation
bundle: use a strbuf to scan the log for boundary commits
bundle: put strbuf_readline_fd in strbuf.c with adjustments
run-command: treat inaccessible directories as ENOENT
When execvp reports EACCES, it can be one of two things:
1. We found a file to execute, but did not have
permissions to do so.
2. We did not have permissions to look in some directory
in the $PATH.
In the former case, we want to consider this a
permissions problem and report it to the user as such (since
getting this for something like "git foo" is likely a
configuration error).
In the latter case, there is a good chance that the
inaccessible directory does not contain anything of
interest. Reporting "permission denied" is confusing to the
user (and prevents our usual "did you mean...?" lookup). It
also prevents git from trying alias lookup, since we do so
only when an external command does not exist (not when it
exists but has an error).
This patch detects EACCES from execvp, checks whether we are
in case (2), and if so converts errno to ENOENT. This
behavior matches that of "bash" (but not of simpler shells
that use execvp more directly, like "dash").
Test stolen from Junio.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
compat/mingw.[ch]: Change return type of exec functions to int
The POSIX standard specifies a return type of int for all six exec
functions. In addition, all exec functions return -1 on error, and
simply do not return on success. However, the current emulation of
the exec functions on mingw are declared with a void return type.
This would cause a problem should any code attempt to call the
exec function in a non-void context. In particular, if an exec
function were used in a conditional it would fail to compile.
In order to improve the fidelity of the emulation, we change the
return type of the mingw_execv[p] functions to int and return -1
on error.
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
push: error out when the "upstream" semantics does not make sense
The user can say "git push" without specifying any refspec. When using
the "upstream" semantics via the push.default configuration, the user
wants to update the "upstream" branch of the current branch, which is the
branch at a remote repository the current branch is set to integrate with,
with this command.
However, there are cases that such a "git push" that uses the "upstream"
semantics does not make sense:
- The current branch does not have branch.$name.remote configured. By
definition, "git push" that does not name where to push to will not
know where to push to. The user may explicitly say "git push $there",
but again, by definition, no branch at repository $there is set to
integrate with the current branch in this case and we wouldn't know
which remote branch to update.
- The current branch does have branch.$name.remote configured, but it
does not specify branch.$name.merge that names what branch at the
remote this branch integrates with. "git push" knows where to push in
this case (or the user may explicitly say "git push $remote" to tell us
where to push), but we do not know which remote branch to update.
- The current branch does have its remote and upstream branch configured,
but the user said "git push $there", where $there is not the remote
named by "branch.$name.remote". By definition, no branch at repository
$there is set to integrate with the current branch in this case, and
this push is not meant to update any branch at the remote repository
$there.
The first two cases were already checked correctly, but the third case was
not checked and we ended up updating the branch named branch.$name.merge
at repository $there, which was totally bogus.
add--interactive: ignore unmerged entries in patch mode
When "add -p" sees an unmerged entry, it shows the combined
diff and then immediately skips the hunk. This can be
confusing in a variety of ways, depending on whether there
are other changes to stage (in which case you get the
superfluous combined diff output in between other hunks) or
not (in which case you get the combined diff and the program
exits immediately, rather than seeing "No changes").
The current behavior was not planned, and is just what the
implementation happens to do. Instead, let's explicitly
remove unmerged entries from our list of modified files, and
print a warning that we are ignoring them.
We can cheaply find which entries are unmerged by adding
"--raw" output to the "diff-files --numstat" we already run.
There is one non-obvious thing we must change when parsing
this combined output. Before this patch, when we saw a
numstat line for a file that did not have index changes, we
would create a new record with 'unchanged' in the 'INDEX'
field. Because "--raw" comes before "--numstat", we must
move this special-case down to the raw-line case (and it is
sufficient to move it rather than handle it in both places,
since any file which has a --numstat will also have a --raw
entry).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Documentation/git-commit: rephrase the "initial-ness" of templates
The description of "commit -t <file>" said the file is used "as the
initial version" of the commit message, but in the context of an SCM,
"version" is a loaded word that can needlesslyl confuse readers.
Explain the purpose of the mechanism without using "version".
gitk: fix tabbed preferences construction when using tcl 8.4
In 8.5 the incr command creates the target variable if it does not exist
but in 8.4 using incr on a non-existing variable raises an error. Ensure
we have created our counter variable when creating the tabbed dialog for
non-themed preferences.
Reported-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Pat Thoyts <patthoyts@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Portuguese Portuguese translations from Marco Sousa via Jiang Xin
* 'master' of git://github.com/git-l10n/git-po:
l10n: Add the Dutch translation team and initialize nl.po
l10n: Inital Portuguese Portugal language (pt_PT)
l10n: Improve zh_CN translation for Git 1.7.10-rc3
Make it clear that, when using commit --template, the message *must* be
changed or the commit will be aborted.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Helped-by: Ivan Heffner <iheffner@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Adam Monsen <haircut@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
commit: rephrase the error when user did not touch templated log message
When the user exited editor without editing the commit log template given
by "git commit -t <template>", the commit was aborted (correct) with an
error message that said "due to empty commit message" (incorrect).
This was because the original template support was done by piggybacking on
the check to detect an empty log message. Split the codepaths into two
independent checks to clarify the error.
commit: do not trigger bogus "has templated message edited" check
When "-t template" and "-F msg" options are both given (or worse yet,
there is "commit.template" configuration but a message is given in some
other way), the documentation says that template is ignored. However,
the "has the user edited the message?" check still used the contents of
the template file as the basis of the emptyness check.
These tests try to run "git commit" with various "forbidden" combinations
of options and expect the command to fail, but they do so without having
any change added to the index. We wouldn't be able to catch breakages
that would allow these combinations by mistake with them because the
command will fail with "nothing to commit" anyway.
Make sure we have something added to the index before running the command.
v1.7.9-8-g270a344 (config: stop using config_exclusive_filename) replaced
config_exclusive_filename with given_config_file. In one case this
resulted in a self-assignment, which is reported by clang as a warning.
Remove the useless code.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Why not just git grep -E ...?
That wouldn't work then the doubled words are separated by a newline.
This is derived from a Makefile syntax-check rule in gnulib's maint.mk:
http://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/tree/top/maint.mk
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* 'master' of git://github.com/git-l10n/git-po:
Add url of Swedish l10n team in TEAMS file
l10n: Review zh_CN translation for Git 1.7.10-rc1
Update Swedish translation (724t0f0u).
l10n: Update zh_CN translation for Git 1.7.10-rc1
l10n: Update git.pot (1 new message)
$COLUMNS must be unset to not interfere with the tests. The tests
already ignore the terminal size because output is redirected to a
file, but COLUMNS overrides terminal size detection and changes the
test output away from the standard 80.
Reported-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@in.waw.pl> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Update for 1.7.10-rc1.
- Add a missing -e when generaring the "Untracked files" message.
- Fixed some wordings after playing with the localized version.
Documentation: improve description of GIT_EDITOR and preference order
Previously GIT_EDITOR was not listed in git(1) "Environment Variables" section,
which could be very confusing to users. Include it in "other" subsection along
with a link to git-var(1), since that is the page that fully describes all
places where editor can be set and also their preference order.
Also, git-var(1) did not say that hardcoded fallback 'vi' may have been changed
at build time. A user could be puzzled if 'nano' pops up even when none of the
mentioned environment vars or config.editor are set. Clarify this.
Ideally, the build system should be changed to reflect the chosen fallback
editor when creating the man pages. Not sure if that is even possible though.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Silva (MestreLion) <linux@rodrigosilva.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
documentation: fix alphabetic ordered list for git-rebase man page
An alphabetic ordered list (a.) is converted to numerical in
the man page (1.) so context comments naming 'a' were confusing,
fix that by not using ordered list notation for 'a' anb 'b' items.
Signed-off-by: Nelson Benitez Leon <nelsonjesus.benitez@seap.minhap.es> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If both la and context are zero at the start of the loop, la wraps around
and we end up reading from memory far away. Skip the loop in that case
instead.
Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge gitk changes from Paul Mackerras at git://ozlabs.org/~paulus/gitk
* git://ozlabs.org/~paulus/gitk:
gitk: Teach gitk to respect log.showroot
gitk: Add menu items for comparing a commit with the marked commit
gitk: Speed up resolution of short SHA1 ids
gitk: Use symbolic font names "sans" and "monospace" when available
gitk: Skip over AUTHOR/COMMIT_DATE when searching all fields
gitk: Make "git describe" output clickable, too
gitk: Fix the display of files when filtered by path
gitk: Use a tabbed dialog to edit preferences
gitk: Use "gitk: repo-top-level-dir" as window title
In early days, all projects managed by git (except for git itself) had the
product of a fairly mature development history in their first commit, and
it was deemed unnecessary clutter to show additions of these thousands of
paths as a patch.
"git log" learned to show the patch for the initial commit without requiring
--root command line option at 0f03ca9 (config option log.showroot to show
the diff of root commits, 2006-11-23).
Teach gitk to respect log.showroot.
[paulus@samba.org: Cleaned up the Tcl a bit, use --bool on the
git config call]
Signed-off-by: Marcus Karlsson <mk@acc.umu.se> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
merge-recursive: don't detect renames of empty files
Merge-recursive detects renames so that if one side modifies
"foo" and the other side moves it to "bar", the modification
is applied to "bar". However, our rename detection is based
on content analysis, it can be wrong (i.e., two files were
not intended as a rename, but just happen to have the same
or similar content).
This is quite rare if the files actually contain content,
since two unrelated files are unlikely to have exactly the
same content. However, empty files present a problem, in
that there is nothing to analyze. An uninteresting
placeholder file with zero bytes may or may not be related
to a placeholder file with another name.
The result is that adding content to an empty file may cause
confusion if the other side of a merge removed it; your
content may end up in another random placeholder file that
was added.
Let's err on the side of caution and not consider empty
files as renames. This will cause a modify/delete conflict
on the merge, which will let the user sort it out
themselves.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
teach diffcore-rename to optionally ignore empty content
Our rename detection is a heuristic, matching pairs of
removed and added files with similar or identical content.
It's unlikely to be wrong when there is actual content to
compare, and we already take care not to do inexact rename
detection when there is not enough content to produce good
results.
However, we always do exact rename detection, even when the
blob is tiny or empty. It's easy to get false positives with
an empty blob, simply because it is an obvious content to
use as a boilerplate (e.g., when telling git that an empty
directory is worth tracking via an empty .gitignore).
This patch lets callers specify whether or not they are
interested in using empty files as rename sources and
destinations. The default is "yes", keeping the original
behavior. It works by detecting the empty-blob sha1 for
rename sources and destinations.
One more flexible alternative would be to allow the caller
to specify a minimum size for a blob to be "interesting" for
rename detection. But that would catch small boilerplate
files, not large ones (e.g., if you had the GPL COPYING file
in many directories).
A better alternative would be to allow a "-rename"
gitattribute to allow boilerplate files to be marked as
such. I'll leave the complexity of that solution until such
time as somebody actually wants it. The complaints we've
seen so far revolve around empty files, so let's start with
the simple thing.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The read-cache implementation defines this static function,
but it is a generally useful concept in git. Let's give
the empty blob the same treatment as the empty tree,
providing both hex and binary forms of the sha1.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This macro already evaluates to the correct type, as it
casts the string literal to "unsigned char *" itself
(and callers who want the literal can use the _LITERAL
form).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitk: Add menu items for comparing a commit with the marked commit
Sometimes one wants to see the different between two commits that are
a long distance apart in the graph display. This is difficult to do
with the "Diff this -> selected" and "Diff selected -> this" menu
items because the need to maintain the selection means that one can't
use the find facilities or the reference list window to navigate from
one to the other.
This provides an alternative using the mark. Having found one commit,
one marks it with the "Mark this commit" menu item, then navigates to
the other commit and uses the new "Diff this -> marked commit" and/or
"Diff marked commit -> this" menu items.
Even though 1.7.9.x series does not open the editor by default
when merging in general, it does do so in one occassion: when
merging an annotated tag. And worse yet, there is no good way
for older scripts to decline this.
Backport the support for GIT_MERGE_AUTOEDIT environment variable
from 1.7.10 track to help those stuck on 1.7.9.x maintenance
track.