t6046: testcases checking whether updates can be skipped in a merge
Add several tests checking whether updates can be skipped in a merge.
Also add several similar testcases for where updates cannot be skipped in
a merge to make sure that we skip if and only if we should.
In particular:
* Testcase 1a (particularly 1a-check-L) would have pointed out the
problem Linus has been dealing with for year with his merges[1].
* Testcase 2a (particularly 2a-check-L) would have pointed out the
problem with my directory-rename-series before it broke master[2].
* Testcases 3[ab] (particularly 3a-check-L) provide a simpler testcase
than 12b of t6043 making that one easier to understand.
* There are several complementary testcases to make sure we're not just
fixing those particular issues while regressing in the opposite
direction.
* There are also a pair of tests for the special case when a merge
results in a skippable update AND the user has dirty modifications to
the path.
merge-recursive: avoid triggering add_cacheinfo error with dirty mod
If a cherry-pick or merge with a rename results in a skippable update
(due to the merged content matching what HEAD already had), but the
working directory is dirty, avoid trying to refresh the index as that
will fail.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive: move more is_dirty handling to merge_content
conflict_rename_normal() was doing some handling for dirty files that
more naturally belonged in merge_content. Move it, and rename a
parameter for clarity while at it.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Four closely related changes all with the purpose of fixing error handling
in this function:
- fix reported function name in add_cacheinfo error messages
- differentiate between the two error messages
- abort early when we hit the error (stop ignoring return code)
- mark a test which was hitting this error as failing until we get the
right fix
In more detail...
In commit 0424138d5715 ("Fix bogus error message from merge-recursive
error path", 2007-04-01), it was noted that the name of the function which
the error message claimed it was reported from did not match the actual
function name. This was changed to something closer to the real function
name, but it still didn't match the actual function name. Fix the
reported name to match.
Second, the two errors in this function had identical messages, preventing
us from knowing which error had been triggered. Add a couple words to the
second error message to differentiate the two.
Next, make sure callers do not ignore the return code so that it will stop
processing further entries (processing further entries could result in
more output which could cause the error to scroll off the screen, or at
least be missed by the user) and make it clear the error is the cause of
the early abort. These errors should never be triggered in production; if
either one is, it represents a bug in the calling path somewhere and is
likely to have resulted in mis-merged content. The combination of
ignoring of the return code and continuing to print other standard
messages after hitting the error resulted in the following bug report from
Junio: "...the command pretends that everything went well and merged
cleanly in that path...[Behaving] in a buggy and unexplainable way is bad
enough, doing so silently is unexcusable." Fix this.
Finally, there was one test in the testsuite that did hit this error path,
but was passing anyway. This would have been easy to miss since it had a
test_must_fail and thus could have failed for the wrong reason, but in a
separate testing step I added an intentional NULL-dereference to the
codepath where these error messages are printed in order to flush out such
cases. I could modify that test to explicitly check for this error and
fail the test if it is hit, but since this test operates in a bit of a
gray area and needed other changes, I went for a different fix. The gray
area this test operates in is the following: If the merge of a certain
file results in the same version of the file that existed in HEAD, but
there are dirty modifications to the file, is that an error with a
"Refusing to overwrite existing file" expected, or a case where the merge
should succeed since we shouldn't have to touch the dirty file anyway?
Recent discussion on the list leaned towards saying it should be a
success. Therefore, change the expected behavior of this test to match.
As a side effect, this makes the failed-due-to-hitting-add_cacheinfo-error
very clear, and we can mark the test as test_expect_failure. A subsequent
commit will implement the necessary changes to get this test to pass
again.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive: avoid spurious rename/rename conflict from dir renames
If a file on one side of history was renamed, and merely modified on the
other side, then applying a directory rename to the modified side gives us
a rename/rename(1to2) conflict. We should only apply directory renames to
pairs representing either adds or renames.
Making this change means that a directory rename testcase that was
previously reported as a rename/delete conflict will now be reported as a
modify/delete conflict.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
directory rename detection: new testcases showcasing a pair of bugs
Add a testcase showing spurious rename/rename(1to2) conflicts occurring
due to directory rename detection.
Also add a pair of testcases dealing with moving directory hierarchies
around that were suggested by Stefan Beller as "food for thought" during
his review of an earlier patch series, but which actually uncovered a
bug. Round things out with a test that is a cross between the two
testcases that showed existing bugs in order to make sure we aren't
merely addressing problems in isolation but in general.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive: fix overwriting dirty files involved in renames
This fixes an issue that existed before my directory rename detection
patches that affects both normal renames and renames implied by
directory rename detection. Additional codepaths that only affect
overwriting of dirty files that are involved in directory rename
detection will be added in a subsequent commit.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive: apply necessary modifications for directory renames
This commit hooks together all the directory rename logic by making the
necessary changes to the rename struct, it's dst_entry, and the
diff_filepair under consideration.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive: when comparing files, don't include trees
get_renames() would look up stage data that already existed (populated
in get_unmerged(), taken from whatever unpack_trees() created), and if
it didn't exist, would call insert_stage_data() to create the necessary
entry for the given file. The insert_stage_data() fallback becomes
much more important for directory rename detection, because that creates
a mechanism to have a file in the resulting merge that didn't exist on
either side of history. However, insert_stage_data(), due to calling
get_tree_entry() loaded up trees as readily as files. We aren't
interested in comparing trees to files; the D/F conflict handling is
done elsewhere. This code is just concerned with what entries existed
for a given path on the different sides of the merge, so create a
get_tree_entry_if_blob() helper function and use it.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive: check for file level conflicts then get new name
Before trying to apply directory renames to paths within the given
directories, we want to make sure that there aren't conflicts at the
file level either. If there aren't any, then get the new name from
any directory renames.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive: add computation of collisions due to dir rename & merging
directory renaming and merging can cause one or more files to be moved to
where an existing file is, or to cause several files to all be moved to
the same (otherwise vacant) location. Add checking and reporting for such
cases, falling back to no-directory-rename handling for such paths.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive: check for directory level conflicts
Before trying to apply directory renames to paths within the given
directories, we want to make sure that there aren't conflicts at the
directory level. There will be additional checks at the individual
file level too, which will be added later.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This populates a set of directory renames for us. The set of directory
renames is not yet used, but will be in subsequent commits.
Note that the use of a string_list for possible_new_dirs in the new
dir_rename_entry struct implies an O(n^2) algorithm; however, in practice
I expect the number of distinct directories that files were renamed into
from a single original directory to be O(1). My guess is that n has a
mode of 1 and a mean of less than 2, so, for now, string_list seems good
enough for possible_new_dirs.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive: make a helper function for cleanup for handle_renames
In anticipation of more involved cleanup to come, make a helper function
for doing the cleanup at the end of handle_renames. Rename the already
existing cleanup_rename[s]() to final_cleanup_rename[s](), name the new
helper initial_cleanup_rename(), and leave the big comment in the code
about why we can't do all the cleanup at once.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive: split out code for determining diff_filepairs
Create a new function, get_diffpairs() to compute the diff_filepairs
between two trees. While these are currently only used in
get_renames(), I want them to be available to some new functions. No
actual logic changes yet.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive: make !o->detect_rename codepath more obvious
Previously, if !o->detect_rename then get_renames() would return an
empty string_list, and then process_renames() would have nothing to
iterate over. It seems more straightforward to simply avoid calling
either function in that case.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive: fix leaks of allocated renames and diff_filepairs
get_renames() has always zero'ed out diff_queued_diff.nr while only
manually free'ing diff_filepairs that did not correspond to renames.
Further, it allocated struct renames that were tucked away in the
return string_list. Make sure all of these are deallocated when we
are done with them.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive: introduce new functions to handle rename logic
The amount of logic in merge_trees() relative to renames was just a few
lines, but split it out into new handle_renames() and cleanup_renames()
functions to prepare for additional logic to be added to each. No code or
logic changes, just a new place to put stuff for when the rename detection
gains additional checks.
Note that process_renames() records pointers to various information (such
as diff_filepairs) into rename_conflict_info structs. Even though the
rename string_lists are not directly used once handle_renames() completes,
we should not immediately free the lists at the end of that function
because they store the information referenced in the rename_conflict_info,
which is used later in process_entry(). Thus the reason for a separate
cleanup_renames().
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Move this function so it can re-use some others (without either
moving all of them or adding an annoying split between function
declarations and definitions). Cheat slightly by adding a blank line
for readability, and in order to silence checkpatch.pl.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
directory rename detection: miscellaneous testcases to complete coverage
I came up with the testcases in the first eight sections before coding up
the implementation. The testcases in this section were mostly ones I
thought of while coding/debugging, and which I was too lazy to insert
into the previous sections because I didn't want to re-label with all the
testcase references. :-)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'svn/authors-prog-2' of git://bogomips.org/git-svn
* 'svn/authors-prog-2' of git://bogomips.org/git-svn:
git-svn: allow empty email-address using authors-prog and authors-file
git-svn: search --authors-prog in PATH too
The topic appears to inflict severe regression in renaming merges,
even though the promise of it was that it would improve them.
We do not yet know which exact change in the topic was wrong, but in
the meantime, let's play it safe and revert it out of 'master'
before real Git-using projects are harmed.
* ab/doc-hash-brokenness:
doc hash-function-transition: clarify what SHAttered means
doc hash-function-transition: clarify how older gits die on NewHash
The mechanism to use parse-options API to automate the command line
completion continues to get extended and polished.
* nd/parseopt-completion-more:
completion: use __gitcomp_builtin in _git_cherry
completion: use __gitcomp_builtin in _git_ls_tree
completion: delete option-only completion commands
completion: add --option completion for most builtin commands
completion: factor out _git_xxx calling code
completion: mention the oldest version we need to support
git.c: add hidden option --list-parseopt-builtins
git.c: move cmd_struct declaration up
Code to find the length to uniquely abbreviate object names based
on packfile content, which is a relatively recent addtion, has been
optimized to use the same fan-out table.
* ds/bsearch-hash:
sha1_name: use bsearch_pack() in unique_in_pack()
sha1_name: use bsearch_pack() for abbreviations
packfile: define and use bsearch_pack()
sha1_name: convert struct min_abbrev_data to object_id
* ws/rebase-p:
rebase: remove merges_option and a blank line
rebase: remove unused code paths from git_rebase__interactive__preserve_merges
rebase: remove unused code paths from git_rebase__interactive
rebase: add and use git_rebase__interactive__preserve_merges
rebase: extract functions out of git_rebase__interactive
rebase: reindent function git_rebase__interactive
rebase: update invocation of rebase dot-sourced scripts
rebase-interactive: simplify pick_on_preserving_merges
"diff-highlight" filter (in contrib/) learned to undertand "git log
--graph" output better.
* jk/diff-highlight-graph-fix:
diff-highlight: detect --graph by indent
diff-highlight: use flush() helper consistently
diff-highlight: test graphs with --color
diff-highlight: test interleaved parallel lines of history
diff-highlight: prefer "echo" to "cat" in tests
diff-highlight: use test_tick in graph test
diff-highlight: correct test graph diagram
* nd/remove-ignore-env-field:
repository.h: add comment and clarify repo_set_gitdir
repository: delete ignore_env member
sha1_file.c: move delayed getenv(altdb) back to setup_git_env()
repository.c: delete dead functions
repository.c: move env-related setup code back to environment.c
repository: initialize the_repository in main()
"git stash push -u -- <pathspec>" gave an unnecessary and confusing
error message when there was no tracked files that match the
<pathspec>, which has been fixed.
The way "git worktree prune" worked internally has been simplified,
by assuming how "git worktree move" moves an existing worktree to a
different place.
* nd/worktree-prune:
worktree prune: improve prune logic when worktree is moved
worktree: delete dead code
gc.txt: more details about what gc does
Conversion from uchar[20] to struct object_id continues.
* bc/object-id: (36 commits)
convert: convert to struct object_id
sha1_file: introduce a constant for max header length
Convert lookup_replace_object to struct object_id
sha1_file: convert read_sha1_file to struct object_id
sha1_file: convert read_object_with_reference to object_id
tree-walk: convert tree entry functions to object_id
streaming: convert istream internals to struct object_id
tree-walk: convert get_tree_entry_follow_symlinks internals to object_id
builtin/notes: convert static functions to object_id
builtin/fmt-merge-msg: convert remaining code to object_id
sha1_file: convert sha1_object_info* to object_id
Convert remaining callers of sha1_object_info_extended to object_id
packfile: convert unpack_entry to struct object_id
sha1_file: convert retry_bad_packed_offset to struct object_id
sha1_file: convert assert_sha1_type to object_id
builtin/mktree: convert to struct object_id
streaming: convert open_istream to use struct object_id
sha1_file: convert check_sha1_signature to struct object_id
sha1_file: convert read_loose_object to use struct object_id
builtin/index-pack: convert struct ref_delta_entry to object_id
...
"git shortlog cruft" aborted with a BUG message when run outside a
Git repository. The command has been taught to complain about
extra and unwanted arguments on its command line instead in such a
case.
The build procedure learned to optionally use symbolic links
(instead of hardlinks and copies) to install "git-foo" for built-in
commands, whose binaries are all identical.
* ab/install-symlinks:
Makefile: optionally symlink libexec/git-core binaries to bin/git
Makefile: add a gitexecdir_relative variable
Makefile: fix broken bindir_relative variable
"git filter-branch" learned to use a different exit code to allow
the callers to tell the case where there was no new commits to
rewrite from other error cases.
* ml/filter-branch-no-op-error:
filter-branch: return 2 when nothing to rewrite
Git can be built to use either v1 or v2 of the PCRE library, and so
far, the build-time configuration USE_LIBPCRE=YesPlease instructed
the build procedure to use v1, but now it means v2. USE_LIBPCRE1
and USE_LIBPCRE2 can be used to explicitly choose which version to
use, as before.
* ab/pcre-v2:
Makefile: make USE_LIBPCRE=YesPlease mean v2, not v1
configure: detect redundant --with-libpcre & --with-libpcre1
configure: fix a regression in PCRE v1 detection
A "git fetch" from a repository with insane number of refs into a
repository that is already up-to-date still wasted too many cycles
making many lstat(2) calls to see if these objects at the tips
exist as loose objects locally. These lstat(2) calls are optimized
away by enumerating all loose objects beforehand.
It is unknown if the new strategy negatively affects existing use
cases, fetching into a repository with many loose objects from a
repository with small number of refs.
* ti/fetch-everything-local-optim:
fetch-pack.c: use oidset to check existence of loose object
Rename detection logic in "diff" family that is used in "merge" has
learned to guess when all of x/a, x/b and x/c have moved to z/a,
z/b and z/c, it is likely that x/d added in the meantime would also
want to move to z/d by taking the hint that the entire directory
'x' moved to 'z'. A bug causing dirty files involved in a rename
to be overwritten during merge has also been fixed as part of this
work.
* en/rename-directory-detection: (29 commits)
merge-recursive: ensure we write updates for directory-renamed file
merge-recursive: avoid spurious rename/rename conflict from dir renames
directory rename detection: new testcases showcasing a pair of bugs
merge-recursive: fix remaining directory rename + dirty overwrite cases
merge-recursive: fix overwriting dirty files involved in renames
merge-recursive: avoid clobbering untracked files with directory renames
merge-recursive: apply necessary modifications for directory renames
merge-recursive: when comparing files, don't include trees
merge-recursive: check for file level conflicts then get new name
merge-recursive: add computation of collisions due to dir rename & merging
merge-recursive: check for directory level conflicts
merge-recursive: add get_directory_renames()
merge-recursive: make a helper function for cleanup for handle_renames
merge-recursive: split out code for determining diff_filepairs
merge-recursive: make !o->detect_rename codepath more obvious
merge-recursive: fix leaks of allocated renames and diff_filepairs
merge-recursive: introduce new functions to handle rename logic
merge-recursive: move the get_renames() function
directory rename detection: tests for handling overwriting dirty files
directory rename detection: tests for handling overwriting untracked files
...
containing the SVN repository UUID. Now git-svn behaves like git-commit:
If the email is *explicitly* set to the empty string using '<>', the
commit does not contain an email address, only the name:
jondoe <>
Allowing to remove the email address *intentionally* prevents automatic
systems from sending emails to those fictional addresses and avoids
cluttering the log output with unnecessary stuff.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Heiduk <asheiduk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
In 36db1eddf9 ("git-svn: add --authors-prog option", 2009-05-14) the path
to authors-prog was made absolute because git-svn changes the current
directory in some situations. This makes sense if the program is part of
the repository but prevents searching via $PATH.
The old behaviour is still retained, but if the file does not exists, then
authors-prog is searched for in $PATH as any other command.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Heiduk <asheiduk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
add -p: fix 2.17.0-rc* regression due to moved code
Fix a regression in 88f6ffc1c2 ("add -p: only bind search key if
there's more than one hunk", 2018-02-13) which is present in
2.17.0-rc*, but not 2.16.0.
In Perl, regex variables like $1 always refer to the last regex
match. When the aforementioned change added a new regex match between
the old match and the corresponding code that was expecting $1, the $1
variable would always be undef, since the newly inserted regex match
doesn't have any captures.
As a result the "/" feature to search for a string in a hunk by regex
completely broke, on git.git:
$ perl -pi -e 's/Git/Tig/g' README.md
$ ./git --exec-path=$PWD add -p
[..]
Stage this hunk [y,n,q,a,d,j,J,g,/,s,e,?]? s
Split into 4 hunks.
[...]
Stage this hunk [y,n,q,a,d,j,J,g,/,s,e,?]? /Many
Use of uninitialized value $1 in string eq at /home/avar/g/git/git-add--interactive line 1568, <STDIN> line 1.
search for regex? Many
I.e. the initial "/regex" command wouldn't work, and would always emit
a warning and ask again for a regex, now it works as intended again.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
upload-pack: disable object filtering when disabled by config
When upload-pack gained partial clone support (v2.17.0-rc0~132^2~12,
2017-12-08), it was guarded by the uploadpack.allowFilter config item
to allow server operators to control when they start supporting it.
That config item didn't go far enough, though: it controls whether the
'filter' capability is advertised, but if a (custom) client ignores
the capability advertisement and passes a filter specification anyway,
the server would handle that despite allowFilter being false.
This is particularly significant if a security bug is discovered in
this new experimental partial clone code. Installations without
uploadpack.allowFilter ought not to be affected since they don't
intend to support partial clone, but they would be swept up into being
vulnerable.
Simplify and limit the attack surface by making uploadpack.allowFilter
disable the feature, not just the advertisement of it.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
credential: ignore SIGPIPE when writing to credential helpers
The credential subsystem can trigger SIGPIPE when writing to an
external helper if that helper closes its stdin before reading the
whole input. Normally this is rare, since helpers would need to read
that input to make a decision about how to respond, but:
1. It's reasonable to configure a helper which only handles "get"
while ignoring "store". Such a handler might not read stdin
for "store", thereby rapidly closing stdin upon helper exit.
2. A broken or misbehaving helper might exit immediately. That's an
error, but it's not reasonable for it to take down the parent Git
process with SIGPIPE.
Even with such a helper, seeing this problem should be rare. Getting
SIGPIPE requires the helper racily exiting before we've written the
fairly small credential output.
Signed-off-by: Erik E Brady <brady@cisco.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
submodule: check for NULL return of get_submodule_ref_store()
If we can't find a ref store for a submodule then assume the latter
is not initialized (or was removed). Print a status line accordingly
instead of causing a segmentation fault by passing NULL as the first
parameter of refs_head_ref().
Reported-by: Jeremy Feusi <jeremy@feusi.co> Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Initial-Test-By: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Hotfix for recently graduated topic that give help to completion
scripts from the Git subcommands that are being completed
* nd/parseopt-completion:
t9902: disable test on the list of merge-strategies under GETTEXT_POISON
completion: clear cached --options when sourcing the completion script
test: avoid pipes in git related commands for test
Avoid using pipes downstream of Git commands since the exit codes
of commands upstream of pipes get swallowed, thus potentially
hiding failure of those commands. Instead, capture Git command
output to a file and apply the downstream command(s) to that file.
Signed-off-by: Pratik Karki <predatoramigo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
submodule deinit: handle non existing pathspecs gracefully
This fixes a regression introduced in 2e612731b5 (submodule: port
submodule subcommand 'deinit' from shell to C, 2018-01-15), when
handling pathspecs that do not exist gracefully. This restores the
historic behavior of reporting the pathspec as unknown and returning
instead of reporting a bug.
Reported-by: Peter Oberndorfer <kumbayo84@arcor.de> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 1ada5020b3 ("stash: use stash_push for no verb form", 2017-02-28),
when the pathspec argument was introduced in 'git stash', that was also
documented. However I forgot to remove an extra square bracket after
the '--message' argument, even though the square bracket should have
been after the pathspec argument (where it was also added).
Remove the extra square bracket after the '--message' argument, to show
that the pathspec argument should be used with the 'push' verb.
While the pathspec argument can be used without the push verb, that's a
special case described later in the man page, and removing the first extra
square bracket instead of the second one makes the synopis easier to
understand.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
doc hash-function-transition: clarify what SHAttered means
Attempt to clarify what the SHAttered attack means in practice for
Git. The previous version of the text made no mention whatsoever of
Git already having a mitigation for this specific attack, which the
SHAttered researchers claim will detect cryptanalytic collision
attacks.
I may have gotten some of the nuances wrong, but as far as I know this
new text accurately summarizes the current situation with SHA-1 in
git. I.e. git doesn't really use SHA-1 anymore, it uses
Hardened-SHA-1 (they just so happen to produce the same outputs
99.99999999999...% of the time).
Thus the previous text was incorrect in asserting that:
[...]As a result [of SHAttered], SHA-1 cannot be considered
cryptographically secure any more[...]
That's not the case. We have a mitigation against SHAttered, *however*
we consider it prudent to move to work towards a NewHash should future
vulnerabilities in either SHA-1 or Hardened-SHA-1 emerge.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
doc hash-function-transition: clarify how older gits die on NewHash
Change the "Repository format extension" to accurately describe what
happens with different versions of Git when they encounter NewHash
repositories, instead of only saying what happens with versions v2.7.0
and later.
See ab9cb76f66 ("Repository format version check.", 2005-11-25) and 00a09d57eb ("introduce "extensions" form of
core.repositoryformatversion", 2015-06-23) for the relevant changes to
the setup code where these variables are checked.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 11395a3b4b (test_must_be_empty: make sure the file exists, not
just empty, 2018-02-27) basically duplicated the 'test_path_is_file'
helper function in 'test_must_be_empty'.
Just call 'test_path_is_file' to avoid this code duplication.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
One of the most interesting thing one can be interested in when
looking at performance test results is possible performance
regressions.
This new option makes it easy to spot such possible regressions.
This new option is named '--sort-by=regression' to make it
possible and easy to add other ways to sort the results, like for
example '--sort-by=utime'.
If we would like to sort according to how much the stime regressed
we could also add a new option called '--sort-by=regression:stime'.
Then '--sort-by=regression' could become a synonym for
'--sort-by=regression:rtime'.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>