Merge branch 'js/maint-1.6.1-remote-remove-mirror' into maint-1.6.1
* js/maint-1.6.1-remote-remove-mirror:
builtin-remote: make rm operation safer in mirrored repository
builtin-remote: make rm() use properly named variable to hold return value
Merge branch 'ks/maint-1.6.0-mailinfo-folded' into maint-1.6.1
* ks/maint-1.6.0-mailinfo-folded:
mailinfo: tests for RFC2047 examples
mailinfo: add explicit test for mails like '<a.u.thor@example.com> (A U Thor)'
mailinfo: 'From:' header should be unfold as well
mailinfo: correctly handle multiline 'Subject:' header
More friendly message when locking the index fails.
Just saying that index.lock exists doesn't tell the user _what_ to do
to fix the problem. We should give an indication that it's normally
safe to delete index.lock after making sure git isn't running here.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We display empty diffs for files whose timestamps have changed.
Usually, refreshing the index makes those empty diffs go away.
However, when not using the index they are not very useful and
there is no option to suppress them.
This forces on the skip_stat_unmatch option for diff --no-index,
suppressing any empty diffs. This option is also used for diffs
against the index when "diff.autorefreshindex" is set, but that
option does not apply to diff --no-index.
Signed-off-by: Michael Spang <mspang@uwaterloo.ca> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint-1.6.0:
Make repack less likely to corrupt repository
fast-export: ensure we traverse commits in topological order
Clear the delta base cache if a pack is rebuilt
Some platforms refuse to rename a file that is open. When repacking an
already packed repository without adding any new object, the resulting
pack will contain the same set of objects as an existing pack, and on such
platforms, a newly created packfile cannot replace the existing one.
The logic detected this issue but did not try hard enough to recover from
it. Especially because the files that needs renaming come in pairs, there
potentially are different failure modes that one can be renamed but the
others cannot. Asking manual recovery to end users were error prone.
This patch tries to make it more robust by first making sure all the
existing files that need to be renamed have been renamed before
continuing, and attempts to roll back if some failed to rename.
This is based on an initial patch by Robin Rosenberg.
fast-export: ensure we traverse commits in topological order
fast-export will only list as parents those commits which have already
been traversed (making it appear as if merges have been squashed if not
all parents have been traversed). To avoid this silent squashing of
merge commits, we request commits in topological order.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is some risk that re-opening a regenerated pack file with
different offsets could leave stale entries within the delta base
cache that could be matched up against other objects using the same
"struct packed_git*" and pack offset.
Throwing away the entire delta base cache in this case is safer,
as we don't have to worry about a recycled "struct packed_git*"
matching to the wrong base object, resulting in delta apply
errors while unpacking an object.
Suggested-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
revision traversal and pack: notice and die on missing commit
cc0e6c5 (Handle return code of parse_commit in revision machinery,
2007-05-04) attempted to tighten error checking in the revision machinery,
but it wasn't enough. When get_revision_1() was asked for the next commit
to return, it tries to read and simplify the parents of the commit to be
returned, but an error while doing so was silently ignored and reported as
a truncated history to the caller instead.
This resulted in an early end of "git log" output or a pack that lacks
older commits from "git pack-objects", without any error indication in the
exit status from these commands, even though the underlying parse_commit()
issues an error message to the end user.
Note that the codepath in add_parents_list() that paints parents of an
UNINTERESTING commit UNINTERESTING silently ignores the error when
parse_commit() fails; this is deliberate and in line with aeeae1b
(revision traversal: allow UNINTERESTING objects to be missing,
2009-01-27).
Clear the delta base cache during fast-import checkpoint
Otherwise we may reuse the same memory address for a totally
different "struct packed_git", and a previously cached object from
the prior occupant might be returned when trying to unpack an object
from the new pack.
Found-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
gitweb: add $prevent_xss option to prevent XSS by repository content
Add a gitweb configuration variable $prevent_xss that disables features
to prevent content in repositories from launching cross-site scripting
(XSS) attacks in the gitweb domain. Currently, this option makes gitweb
ignore README.html (a better solution may be worked out in the future)
and serve a blob_plain file of an untrusted type with
"Content-Disposition: attachment", which tells the browser not to show
the file at its original URL.
The XSS prevention is currently off by default.
Signed-off-by: Matt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
rev-list: fix showing distance when using --bisect-all
Before d467a52 ("Make '--decorate' set an explicit 'show_decorations'
flag", Nov 3 2008), commit decorations were shown whenever they exist, and
distances stored in them by "git rev-list --bisect-all" were automatically
shown. d467a52 changed the rule so that commit decorations are not shown
unless rev_info explicitly asks to, with its show_decorations bit, but
forgot that the ones "git rev-list --bisect-all" adds need to be shown.
This patch fixes this old breakage.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After the git-core package was renamed to git, git help -w was still looking
for files in /usr/share/doc/git-core-$VERSION instead of
/usr/share/doc/git-$VERSION.
Signed-off-by: David J. Mellor <dmellor@whistlingcat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
builtin-blame.c: Use utf8_strwidth for author's names
git blame misaligns output if a author's name has a differing display width and
strlen; for instance, an accented Latin letter that takes two bytes to encode
will cause the rest of the line to be shifted to the left by one. To fix this,
use utf8_strwidth instead of strlen (and compute the padding ourselves, since
printf doesn't know about UTF-8).
Signed-off-by: Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint-1.6.0:
builtin-mv.c: check for unversionned files before looking at the destination.
Add a testcase for "git mv -f" on untracked files.
Missing && in t/t7001.sh.
builtin-mv.c: check for unversionned files before looking at the destination.
The previous code was failing in the case where one moves an
unversionned file to an existing destination, with mv -f: the
"existing destination" was checked first, and the error was cancelled
by the force flag.
We now check the unrecoverable error first, which fixes the bug.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
builtin-remote: make rm operation safer in mirrored repository
"git remote rm <repo>" happily removes non-remote refs and their reflogs.
This may be okay if the repository truely is a mirror, but if the user
had done "git remote add --mirror <repo>" by accident and was just
undoing their mistake, then they are left in a situation that is
difficult to recover from.
After this commit, "git remote rm" skips over non-remote refs. The user
is advised on how remove branches using "git branch -d", which itself
has nice safety checks wrt to branch removal lacking from "git remote rm".
Non-remote non-branch refs are skipped silently.
Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint-1.6.0:
User-manual: "git stash <comment>" form is long gone
add test-dump-cache-tree in Makefile
fix typo in Documentation
apply: fix access to an uninitialized mode variable, found by valgrind
5c5ba73 (Makefile: Use generic rule to build test programs,
2007-05-31) tried to use generic rule to build test programs, but it
misses the file 'dump-cache-tree.c', since its name is not prefixed by
'test-'. This commit solves this little problem by renaming this file
instead of carrying out an explicit rule in Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Guanqun Lu <guanqun.lu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
apply: fix access to an uninitialized mode variable, found by valgrind
When 'tpatch' was initialized successfully, st_mode was already taken
from the previous diff. We should not try to override it with data
from an lstat() that was never called.
This is a companion patch to 7a07841(git-apply: handle a patch that
touches the same path more than once better).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
filter-branch: Fix fatal error on bare repositories
When git filter-branch is run on a bare repository, it prints out a fatal
error message:
$ git filter-branch branch
Rewrite 476c4839280c219c2317376b661d9d95c1727fc3 (9/9)
WARNING: Ref 'refs/heads/branch' is unchanged
fatal: This operation must be run in a work tree
Note that this fatal error message doesn't prevent git filter-branch from
exiting successfully. (Why doesn't git filter-branch actually exit with an
error when a shell command fails? I'm not sure why it was designed this
way.)
This error message is caused by the following section of code at the end of
git-filter-branch.sh:
if [ "$(is_bare_repository)" = false ]; then
unset GIT_DIR GIT_WORK_TREE GIT_INDEX_FILE
test -z "$ORIG_GIT_DIR" || {
GIT_DIR="$ORIG_GIT_DIR" && export GIT_DIR
}
... elided ...
git read-tree -u -m HEAD
fi
The problem is the call to $(is_bare_repository), which is made before
GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE are restored. This call always returns "false",
even when we're running in a bare repository. But this means that we will
attempt to call 'git read-tree' even in a bare repository, which will fail
and print an error.
This patch modifies git-filter-branch.sh to restore the original
environment variables before trying to call is_bare_repository.
The parameter n of unpack_callback() can have a value of up to
MAX_UNPACK_TREES. The check at the top of unpack_trees() (its only
(indirect) caller) makes sure it cannot exceed this limit.
unpack_callback() passes it and the array src to unpack_nondirectories(),
which has this loop:
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
/* ... */
src[i + o->merge] = o->df_conflict_entry;
o->merge can be 0 or 1, so unpack_nondirectories() potentially accesses
the array src at index MAX_UNPACK_TREES. This patch makes it big enough.
Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The size of the content we are adding may be larger than
2.1G (i.e., "git add gigantic-file"). Most of the code-path
to do so uses size_t or unsigned long to record the size,
but write_loose_object uses a signed int.
On platforms where "int" is 32-bits (which includes x86_64
Linux platforms), we end up passing malloc a negative size.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After you resolve a conflicted merge to remove the path, "git add -u"
failed to record the removal. Instead it errored out by saying that the
removed path is not found in the work tree, but that is what the user
already knows, and the wanted to record the removal as the resolution,
so the error does not make sense.
Also as suggested by Junio, in order to try to catch other MIME
problems, test cases from the "8. Examples" section of RFC2047 are added
to t5100 testsuite as well.
rebase -i squashes submodule changes into unrelated commit
Attempting to rebase three-commit series (two regular changes, followed by
one commit that changes what commit is bound for a submodule path) to
squash the first two results in a failure; not just the first two commits
squashed, but the change to the submodule is also included in the result.
This failure causes the subsequent step to "pick" the change that actually
changes the submodule to be applied, because there is no change left to be
applied.
git: use run_command() to execute dashed externals
We used to simply try calling execvp(); if it succeeded, then we were done
and the new program was running. If it didn't, then we knew that it wasn't
a valid command.
Unfortunately, this interacted badly with the new pager handling. Now that
git remains the parent process and the pager is spawned, git has to hang
around until the pager is finished. We install an atexit handler to do
this, but that handler never gets called if we successfully run execvp.
You could see this behavior by running any dashed external using a pager
(e.g., "git -p stash list"). The command finishes running, but the pager
is still going. In the case of less, it then gets an error reading from
the terminal and exits, potentially leaving the terminal in a broken state
(and not showing the output).
This patch just uses run_command() to try running the dashed external. The
parent git process then waits for the external process to complete and
then handles the pager cleanup as it would for an internal command.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
run_command() returns a single integer specifying either an
error code or the exit status of the spawned program. The
only way to tell the difference is that the error codes are
outside of the allowed range of exit status values.
Rather than make each caller implement the test against a
magic limit, let's provide a macro.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
run_command(): handle missing command errors more gracefully
When run_command() was asked to run a non-existant command, its behavior
varied depending on the platform:
- on POSIX systems, we would fork, and then after the execvp call
failed, we could call die(), which prints a message to stderr and
exits with code 128.
- on Windows, we do a PATH lookup, realize the program isn't there, and
then return ERR_RUN_COMMAND_FORK
The goal of this patch is to make it clear to callers that the specific
error was a missing command. To do this, we will return the error code
ERR_RUN_COMMAND_EXEC, which is already defined in run-command.h, checked
for in several places, but never actually gets set.
The new behavior is:
- on POSIX systems, we exit the forked process with code 127 (the same
as the shell uses to report missing commands). The parent process
recognizes this code and returns an EXEC error. The stderr message is
silenced, since the caller may be speculatively trying to run a
command. Instead, we use trace_printf so that somebody interested in
debugging can see the error that occured.
- on Windows, we check errno, which is already set correctly by
mingw_spawnvpe, and report an EXEC error instead of a FORK error
Thus it is safe to speculatively run a command:
int r = run_command_v_opt(argv, 0);
if (r == -ERR_RUN_COMMAND_EXEC)
/* oops, it wasn't found; try something else */
else
/* we failed for some other reason, error is in r */
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is a static function called run_command which
conflicts with the library function in run-command.c; this
isn't a problem currently, but prevents including
run-command.h in git.c.
This patch just renames the static function to something
more specific and non-conflicting.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
revision traversal: allow UNINTERESTING objects to be missing
Most of the existing codepaths were meant to treat missing uninteresting
objects to be a silently ignored non-error, but there were a few places
in handle_commit() and add_parents_to_list(), which are two key functions
in the revision traversal machinery, that cared:
- When a tag refers to an object that we do not have, we barfed. We
ignore such a tag if it is painted as UNINTERESTING with this change.
- When digging deeper into the ancestry chain of a commit that is already
painted as UNINTERESTING, in order to paint its parents UNINTERESTING,
we barfed if parse_parent() for a parent commit object failed. We can
ignore such a parent commit object.
send-pack: do not send unknown object name from ".have" to pack-objects
v1.6.1 introduced ".have" extension to the protocol to allow the receiving
side to advertise objects that are reachable from refs in the repositories
it borrows from. This was meant to be used by the sending side to avoid
sending such objects; they are already available through the alternates
mechanism.
The client side implementation in v1.6.1, which was introduced with 40c155f (push: prepare sender to receive extended ref information from the
receiver, 2008-09-09) aka v1.6.1-rc1~203^2~1, were faulty in that it did
not consider the possiblity that the repository receiver borrows from
might have objects it does not know about.
This fixes it by refraining from passing missing commits to underlying
pack-objects. Revision machinery may need to be tightened further to
treat missing uninteresting objects as non-error events, but this is an
obvious and safe fix for a maintenance release that is almost good enough.
diff.c: output correct index lines for a split diff
A patch that changes the filetype (e.g. regular file to symlink) of a path
must be split into a deletion event followed by a creation event, which
means that we need to have two independent metainfo lines for each.
However, the code reused the single set of metainfo lines.
As the blob object names recorded on the index lines are usually not used
nor validated on the receiving end, this is not an issue with normal use
of the resulting patch. However, when accepting a binary patch to delete
a blob, git-apply verified that the postimage blob object name on the
index line is 0{40}, hence a patch that deletes a regular file blob that
records binary contents to create a blob with different filetype (e.g. a
symbolic link) failed to apply. "git am -3" also uses the blob object
names recorded on the index line, so it would also misbehave when
synthesizing a preimage tree.
This moves the code to generate metainfo lines around, so that two
independent sets of metainfo lines are used for the split halves.
Additional tests by Jeff King.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Include examples of using HEAD. The order of examples
introduces new concepts one by one. This pushes the
example of deleting a ref to the end of the list.
Documentation: simplify refspec format description
The refspec format description was a mix of regexp and BNF, making it
very difficult to read. The format was also wrong: it did not show
that each part of a refspec is optional in different situations.
Rather than having a confusing grammar, just present the format in
informal prose.
Signed-off-by: Anders Melchiorsen <mail@cup.kalibalik.dk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tr/maint-no-index-fixes:
diff --no-index -q: fix endless loop
diff --no-index: test for pager after option parsing
diff: accept -- when using --no-index
* am/maint-push-doc:
Documentation: avoid using undefined parameters
Documentation: mention branches rather than heads
Documentation: remove a redundant elaboration
Documentation: git push repository can also be a remote